Enzymatic Biofuel Cells for Implantable and Microscale Devices

Abstract

Introduction Technology for electrical power generation using enzyme catalysts, established four decades ago, has recently received increased attention associated with demand for micro-scale and implantable power supplies. The main challenges, namely the fragility of enzyme molecules, characteristic low current density, and poor fundamental understanding of redox biocatalysis, are currently being addressed from a variety of research perspectives, to take advantage of enzyme selectivity, low temperature and moderate pH activity, and manufacturability in small-scale devices. Such an effort benefits from four decades of multidisciplinary research in biosensors and related bioelectrochemical fields. This review paper summarizes the current state of enzymatic biofuel cell research in the context of foreseeable applications and assesses the future prospects of the technology. Emphasis is placed on device performance and engineering aspects, with a view toward practical portable power devices based on enzymatic biofuel cells. Research in biocatalytically modified electrodes, particularly for sensor applications, has provided a significant technological underpinning for current biofuel cell development. There exists significant overlap in technical requirements between sensors and biofuel cells, including chemical and mechanical stability, selectivity, and cost of materials. However, these two technologies diverge in the areas of current density, cell potential and stability. There exists extensive review literature in the area of biological fuel cells. Notably, Palmore and Whitesides summarized biological fuel cell concepts and performance up until about 1992. More recently, Katz and Willner discussed recent progress in novel electrode chemistries for both microbial and enzymatic fuel cells. We do not duplicate these valuable contributions, but instead focus on the strengths and weaknesses of state-of-art materials in the context of specific classes of applications, and point to areas where additional knowledge is currently needed to exploit biological fuel cells. With some exceptions, we focus on contributions made after 1992. Biofuel cells have traditionally been classified according to whether the catalytic enzymes were located inside or outside of living cells. If living cells are involved the system is considered to be microbial, and if not it is considered enzymatic. Although microbial fuel cells posses unique features unmatched by enzymatic cells, such as long-term stability and fuel efficiency, the power densities associated with such devices are typically much lower owing to resistance to mass transfer across cell membranes. Thus, microbial fuel cells are expected to find limited application in smallscale electronic devices. This review will focus on enzymatic biofuel cells. While such cells typically demonstrate reduced stability due to the limited lifetime of extracellular enzymes, and are typically unable to fully oxidize fuels, they allow for substantial concentration of catalysts and removal of mass transfer barriers and provide higher current and power densities, approaching the range of applicability to microand mini-scale electronics applications. Applications and Requirements The range of possible applications for biofuel cells may be broken down into three main subclasses: 1. Implantable power, such as micro-scale cells implanted in human or animal tissue, or larger cells implanted in blood vessels. 2. Power derived from ambient fuels or oxidants, mainly plant saps and juices, but extending to sewage and other waste streams. 3. Power derived from conventional fuels including hydrogen, methanol or higher alcohols. Classes 1 and 2 are closely related. The fuels available for implantable power, such as blood borne glucose or lactate, are ambient in the sense that they are present in a physiological environment in the absence of a fuel cell device. One major distinction between these two classes is that the ambient-fueled cell need not be implanted, and focuses on plantor waste-derived fuels, whereas the implantable cell focuses on animal-derived fuels and is present within the physiological system. Class 3 is unique in that this class competes with well-established conventional fuel cell technology. To a greater or lesser extent, all three classes share the fundamental technical requirements of high power density and high activity.