Abstract
Huge amounts of natural gas hydrate are trapped in an ice-like structure (hydrate). Most of these hydrates have been formed from biogenic degradation of organic waste in the upper crust and are almost pure methane hydrates. With up to 14 mol% methane, concentrated inside a water phase, this is an attractive energy source. Unlike conventional hydrocarbons, these hydrates are widely distributed around the world, and might in total amount to more than twice the energy in all known sources of conventional fossil fuels. A variety of methods for producing methane from hydrate-filled sediments have been proposed and developed through laboratory scale experiments, pilot scale experiments, and theoretical considerations. Thermal stimulation (steam, hot water) and pressure reduction has by far been the dominating technology platforms during the latest three decades. Thermal stimulation as the primary method is too expensive. There are many challenges related to pressure reduction as a method. Conditions of pressure can be changed to outside the hydrate stability zone, but dissociation energy still needs to be supplied. Pressure release will set up a temperature gradient and heat can be transferred from the surrounding formation, but it has never been proven that the capacity and transport ability will ever be enough to sustain a commercial production rate. On the contrary, some recent pilot tests have been terminated due to freezing down. Other problems include sand production and water production. A more novel approach of injecting CO2 into natural gas hydrate-filled sediments have also been investigated in various laboratories around the world with varying success. In this work, we focus on some frequent misunderstandings related to this concept. The only feasible mechanism for the use of CO2 goes though the formation of a new CO2 hydrate from free water in the pores and the incoming CO2. As demonstrated in this work, the nucleation of a CO2 hydrate film rapidly forms a mass transport barrier that slows down any further growth of the CO2 hydrate. Addition of small amounts of surfactants can break these hydrate films. We also demonstrate that the free energy of the CO2 hydrate is roughly 2 kJ/mol lower than the free energy of the CH4 hydrate. In addition to heat release from the formation of the new CO2 hydrate, the increase in ion content of the remaining water will dissociate CH4 hydrate before the CO2 hydrate due to the difference in free energy.
Highlights
Industrial problems related to hydrate formation in pipelines and process equipment has historically motivated much of the hydrate research
We have demonstrated a new approach for calculating enthalpies of hydrate formation and have shown that the released heat of formation of CO2 hydrate may be 10 kJ/mole of hydrate former higher than similar number for CH4 hydrate
We have demonstrated that the free energy of CO2 hydrate is in the order of 2 kJ/mole hydrate lower for CO2 hydrate as compared to CH4 hydrate
Summary
Industrial problems related to hydrate formation in pipelines and process equipment has historically motivated much of the hydrate research. A hydrate phase transition is reversible along the equilibrium curve This is utilized for the Clapeyron-based methods for the formation of hydrate from a separate gas (or liquid) hydrate former phase and a free water phase. This changes the fugacity coefficient for CO2 substantially (see Equation (11)) and results in a steep change in CO2 hydrate equilibrium pressures over the narrow temperature range for the phase transition It is beyond the scope of this work to discuss the rapid change in the CO2 hydrate equilibrium curve. For the liquid water phase in Equation (1), as well as for the empty hydrate chemical potential on the right hand side of Equation (3), results are trivially obtained from Kvamme and Tanaka [29], while the second term on the right hand side is reorganized as:.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.