Abstract

Environmental and technological preferences correlate. Both are empirically accessible via established instruments such as the Two Major Environmental Value model (2-MEV) with “preservation” (PRE) and “utilization” (UTL), and the technology questionnaire with “interest in technology” (INT) and “social aspects of technology” (SOC). Additionally, “appreciation of nature” (APR) was monitored with a seven-item scale. We used these instruments to assess the preferences of freshmen in five different areas of study (law, economics, science, pedagogy, cultural studies). All subsequent analyses unveiled positive relations between appreciation and preservation, between the two technology subscales, as well as between utilization and social aspects of technology. Negative relationships appeared between preservation and utilization, preservation and both technology factors, as well as appreciation and social aspects of technology. In all subsamples, preservers (individuals with preservation preferences) showed little interest in technology or its social aspects; utilizers scored high in social aspects of technology, whereas appreciators displayed no interest in it. The freshmen’s areas of study seem to predict consistent tendencies to (biocentric) preservation or (anthropocentric) utilization. Moreover, females were more likely to preserve and appreciate nature whereas males preferred utilization along with interest in technology as well as in the social implications of technology. The observed differences can be used to develop new and improve existing educational programs; recommendations are discussed.

Highlights

  • The “Fridays for Future” movement mobilizes young people around the globe

  • We examine different aspects of individual environmental values and technology preferences as well as their mutual interaction

  • We identified positive correlations between PARbbEreavniadtioAnPoRf t(hre=Su0b.s4c2a2le,. p < 0.001), in technology” (INT) ManedanSinOgC (r = 0.435, p < 0.001) as well as UTL and social aspects of technology” (SOC) (r = 0.186, p = 0P.R00E3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The “Fridays for Future” movement mobilizes young people around the globe. Pupils stay away from school on Fridays to show their commitment to the fundamental protection of our planet. Only environmental aspects are considered in discussions about sustainability which prevents a consensus between our need to protect the environment and retain technological advances. Their underlying technological advances, support the spread of this movement. Technologies have a poor public reputation, politics and economics encourage a more technically oriented curriculum [1]. This entails the question of whether there is a connection between individual attitudes towards the environment and technology. Instruments have been developed to measure environmental attitudes and preferences in technology, but these attitudes had to be measured independent of each other

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.