Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests that rhythmic temporal structures in the environment influence memory formation. For example, stimuli that appear in synchrony with the beat of background, environmental rhythms are better remembered than stimuli that appear out-of-synchrony with the beat. This rhythmic modulation of memory has been linked to entrained neural oscillations which are proposed to act as a mechanism of selective attention that prioritize processing of events that coincide with the beat. However, it is currently unclear whether rhythm influences memory formation by influencing early (sensory) or late (post-perceptual) processing of stimuli. The current study used stimulus-locked event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate the locus of stimulus processing at which rhythm temporal cues operate in the service of memory formation. Participants viewed a series of visual objects that either appeared in-synchrony or out-of-synchrony with the beat of background music and made a semantic classification (living/non-living) for each object. Participants’ memory for the objects was then tested (in silence). The timing of stimulus presentation during encoding (in-synchrony or out-of-synchrony with the background beat) influenced later ERPs associated with post-perceptual selection and orienting attention in time rather than earlier ERPs associated with sensory processing. The magnitude of post-perceptual ERPs also differed according to whether or not participants demonstrated a mnemonic benefit for in-synchrony compared to out-of-synchrony stimuli, and was related to the magnitude of the rhythmic modulation of memory performance across participants. These results support two prominent theories in the field, the Dynamic Attending Theory and the Oscillation Selection Hypothesis, which propose that neural responses to rhythm act as a core mechanism of selective attention that optimize processing at specific moments in time. Furthermore, they reveal that in addition to acting as a mechanism of early attentional selection, rhythm influences later, post-perceptual cognitive processes as events are transformed into memory.

Highlights

  • Rhythmic temporal structures are common in our environment

  • We investigated whether amplitude modulations differed in participants who demonstrated a rhythmic modulation of memory effect (RMM group; n = 22) and those who did not demonstrate a rhythmic modulation of memory effect (No-RMM group; n = 14)

  • Hickey and colleagues (2020) found that the magnitude of the effect of rhythm on memory performance across individuals is related to the strength of participants’ neural responses to rhythm, and that greater memory for stimuli presented on-beat versus off-beat at encoding is only observed in participants who demonstrate strong neural entrainment at the beat frequency [25]. This motivated separate exploratory analysis of individuals demonstrating a rhythmic modulation of memory effect (RMM; n = 22) and individuals who did not demonstrate a rhythmic modulation of memory effect (No-RMM; n = 14) in the present study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rhythmic temporal structures are common in our environment. Prior research has established that exposure to environmental rhythms influences perception and action by enhancing processing at specific moments of time that align with the rhythmic beat [1,2,3,4]. Stimuli presented in alignment with the timing of a background rhythm (on-beat) were better remembered in subsequent tests of memory than stimuli presented out-of-alignment (off-beat) This rhythmic modulation of memory (RMM) occurred even when rhythmic temporal cues were task-irrelevant and presented in a different modality (auditory) than the target stimuli (visual). This suggests that rather than dividing attention at encoding and negatively impacting subsequent memory [10, 11], background rhythmic cues can guide domain-general attentional resources to specific moments in time and enhance the processing of information that occurs in alignment with the beat. Rhythm entrains attentional oscillations, as proposed in the Dynamic Attending Theory [4, 12,13,14], and dynamically influences what environmental information will be effectively encoded into long-term memory

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call