Abstract

Hydropower is expanding globally and is regarded a key measure for mitigating climate change, but it also results in major environmental degradation, both at local scale and more widely. We can learn lessons about how restoration can be used to alleviate these problems from failures and successes in countries with a long history of hydropower development, such as Norway. Here, hydropower projects grew larger over time, and in the 1960s, the emerging environmentalist movement started to challenge hydropower developments because of their negative impacts on the environment. The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate then appointed a landscape architect who became very influential, particularly due to his skills in aesthetics and photo documentation. He developed principles for designing self-sustaining environments which he called “living nature”, and in particular proposed methods of restoring barren, unattractive, alpine spoil heaps. Later, restoration methods and goals have changed in response to new insights and the changing goals of ecological restoration. Here, we present current best practice for the alpine biome and sum up general lessons in three points: restoration can represent a sustainable, ‘third way’ in the conflict between conservation and development; including a wider group of professionals may improve restoration goals and methods, and effective use of visual communication can be a good way of gaining support for new restoration principles.

Highlights

  • Hydropower harnesses the energy of water moving from higher to lower elevations

  • We show how hydropower development has been an important arena for the development of restoration ecology in Norway

  • Experience of applying restoration ecology in the Norwegian hydropower sector has provided knowledge that will be useful in future projects

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hydropower harnesses the energy of water moving from higher to lower elevations. The first known use of the normal water cycle for labour-intensive work in the form of watermills dates back more than 2000 years, in the Near East [1]. Hydropower contributes to global habitat degradation, which is causing a global decline in biodiversity [19,20] and, on a local scale, the degradation of scenic landscapes [10], see Figure 1 This means that solutions must be found for individual river systems that have suffered negative impacts as a result of regulation of river channels [21,22], and construction of terrestrial structures, including dams, roads, pipelines, tunnels and spoil heaps [23]. Restoration success, i.e., whether the goals have been achieved, is assessed by comparing the restored area to some sort of reference This could be the historical situation at a chosen point in time, or a local site that has the required characteristics, assuming that close resemblance will ensure good ecological function [32]. Based on experience specific to Norway, we discuss how visual communication can win support for the implementation of restoration methods

Development of Hydropower and Restoration Ecology in Norway
Alpine Hydropower Spoil Heaps—A Norwegian Case of Ecological Restoration
Findings
Discussion and Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call