Abstract
Existing theoretical and empirical work on poverty traps does not in detail investigate interactions between environmental reliance and socioeconomic factors over time. A string of studies has documented that environmental products provide rural households with both subsistence and cash income and that high environmental reliance is often associated with poverty. These studies are snapshots and do not allow an understanding of environmental reliance dynamics – are households trapped at high levels of environmental reliance, what factors enable movement from high to low reliance, and how are such movements associated with total household income? Here we develop and present a theory of environmental reliance traps that allows analysis and explanation of changes in household-level environmental reliance over time. We propose operational parametric and non-parametric models for empirical investigation of the theory and employ these using an environmentally augmented three-wave panel household income and asset dataset (n = 427, pooled n = 1212) from Nepal. We found no evidence of an environmental reliance trap in the study population, meaning that all households converged on a single long-term environmental reliance equilibrium point. Households with high environmental reliance moving down toward the equilibrium (n = 358) have low income and asset endowments; while households with low environmental reliance moving up toward the equilibrium (n = 854) are better off, in terms of both income and assets. The approach identified the poorer households that make a living from harvesting substantial amounts of environmental products The probability of being a high-downward moving household is negatively associated with the size of landholding, market access, and female headship, and positively associated with the household head being born in the village and belonging to the most common caste. We argue that the identification of environmental reliance pathways can simultaneously inform interventions aimed at environmental conservation and poverty reduction.
Highlights
Environmental products – fuel, food, medicine, construction materials and other products from natural, non-cultivated environments (Angelsen et al, 2011a) – provide an average of 28% of total income for households with moderate-togood forest access in tropical and sub-tropical countries (Angelsen et al, 2014)
Building on Sjaastad et al (2005), environmental income is defined as the added value from raw and processed environmental products, including timber, non-timber forest products (NTFPs), and incomes generated from environmental activities and services
Understanding the dynamics of environmental income reliance is important to improve our knowledge of the relationships between persistent poverty and environmental sustainability and how environmental products can contribute to the Sustainable Development Goal to end poverty in all forms (Swamy et al, 2018)
Summary
Environmental products – fuel, food, medicine, construction materials and other products from natural, non-cultivated environments (Angelsen et al, 2011a) – provide an average of 28% of total income for households with moderate-togood forest access in tropical and sub-tropical countries (Angelsen et al, 2014). Existing studies at the nexus of household-level environmental reliance, livelihoods, and poverty (e.g., Heubach et al, 2011; Giesbert and Schindler, 2012; Nielsen et al, 2012; Kabubo-Mariara, 2013; Naschold, 2013; Angelsen et al, 2014; Chilongo, 2014; Nguyen et al, 2015; Porro et al, 2015; Walelign, 2016a) are limited by data constraints. They do not analyze changes in environmental reliance over time or identify the covariates determining these changes. There is a lack of theorizing as well as empirical investigation (Barrett et al, 2011)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
