Abstract

Removing backward production capacity and clearing out zombie enterprises is crucial to realize the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals. However, as a command-control environmental regulation policy, whether the New Environmental Protection Law (NEPL) can guide heavy-polluting enterprises to achieve green transformation and get rid of the zombified risk remains unknown. Our article applies the difference-in-difference (DID) method to explore the impact of the stricter environmental regulation policies on the de-zombification of heavily polluting enterprises in the context of the implementation of NEPL in China. The results show that the implementation of NEPL significantly reduces the zombified risk of heavy-polluting enterprises. The results were valid by a series of robustness tests of propensity score matching, common trends test, placebos test, conducting double clustered standard errors to industry and province level, eliminating other policy interference, ruling out reverse causation, easing the potential endogeneity problems, and controlling enterprise's internal management level. Furthermore, there is a time lag in NEPL policy, which requires a long-term mechanism. Moreover, the NEPL can promote enterprise de-zombie governance through the mechanism of market competition and market allocation. The effects of the NEPL are heterogeneous due to the nature of enterprise property rights, enterprise scale, industry radiation capacity, regional development level, and internal management capacity. This article provides policy implications for developing countries to promote de-zombified governance of their economic systems and defuse risks of green transition.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.