Abstract
Abstract The cradle-to-grave environmental impacts of thermochemical ethanol from loblolly pine, eucalyptus, unmanaged hardwoods, forest residues, and switchgrass biomass feedstocks were determined and compared to gasoline. The Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Impacts (TRACI) method was implemented in SimaPro 7.3 to calculate midpoint environmental impacts. Two normalization value sets were used and weighting was performed to produce a single environmental score. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions of cellulosic ethanol as compared to gasoline were 65%–77%, depending on the biomass feedstock, qualifying these biofuels as cellulosic ethanol under the Renewable Fuel Standards (RFS2). Effects of direct land-use change were significant (~ 18%) and could increase the GHG emissions for switchgrass derived ethanol above the federal GHG reduction thresholds for cellulosic ethanol. The production and use of cellulosic ethanol reduced fossil fuel consumption by between 95% and 97% and by 81% for forest and switchgrass derived ethanol, respectively. Cellulosic ethanol, however, did not reduce all environmental impact categories (e.g., eutrophication, ozone depletion respiratory effects, acidification, and smog) compared to gasoline. The fuel scenario ranking from lowest impact to highest impact consistently remained the same for GHG emissions, fossil fuel use, and the two single weight score analysis methods and was, in ascending order, forest residues with no forest establishment burdens, forest residues with forest establishment burdens, natural hardwood, pine, switchgrass, and finally gasoline. The GHG emission reductions from the use of cellulosic ethanol at the renewable fuel standards mandated production volume of 16 billion gallons of cellulosic ethanol per year by 2020 would result in 9–10 billion metric tonnes of GHG emissions avoided.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions
Tonnes Of Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Cellulosic Ethanol
Forest Residues
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Oct 6, 2013
EuroChoices
Jul 1, 2012
Qatar Foundation Annual Research Conference Proceedings Volume 2016 Issue 1
Mar 21, 2016
One Earth
Dec 1, 2021
Climate Change Economics
Aug 1, 2012
Joule
Oct 1, 2020
Energy Procedia
Feb 1, 2009
SSRN Electronic Journal
Apr 6, 2015
Environmental Health Perspectives
Sep 1, 2011
Environmental Science & Technology
Oct 18, 2013
Dec 1, 2013
The Journal of Agricultural Science
Oct 1, 2010
May 15, 2023
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Jan 27, 2018
Fuel Processing Technology
Fuel Processing Technology
Dec 1, 2023
Fuel Processing Technology
Dec 1, 2023
Fuel Processing Technology
Dec 1, 2023
Fuel Processing Technology
Dec 1, 2023
Fuel Processing Technology
Dec 1, 2023
Fuel Processing Technology
Dec 1, 2023
Fuel Processing Technology
Dec 1, 2023
Fuel Processing Technology
Dec 1, 2023
Fuel Processing Technology
Dec 1, 2023
Fuel Processing Technology
Dec 1, 2023