Abstract
In the UK, ballast track beds remain the most commonly constructed, partly because of relatively low initial costs. Concrete track beds, while more expensive to construct, can have lower life-cycle costs and are being actively promoted for use in the UK. This paper describes the results of environmental life-cycle analyses of ballast and generic concrete track beds, including cast-in sleeper and embedded track systems. The scope of the study includes the manufacturing, construction, maintenance, dismantling and recycling of the track bed components. Comparison of the life-cycle analyses of energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions shows that concrete slab track beds are not associated with higher environmental burdens compared with ballast track bed. The limitations of the available data are also discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
