Abstract

Noise and greenhouse gas emission targets set by e.g., the EU commission, NASA, and ICAO oblige the aviation industry to reduce its environmental footprint. Battery-powered hybrid-electric aircraft are currently being investigated in this regard as they can potentially reduce in-flight greenhouse gas emissions and noise. However, most studies to date have focused on the CO2 emission reduction potential instead of considering the total life cycle environmental impact. Hence, within this study an environmental life cycle assessment method for a hybrid-electric aircraft is developed and applied, supplemented by a direct operating costs analysis. This allows the simultaneous evaluation of the environmental impact reduction potential and the economic consequences for aircraft operators. This demonstrates the faced trade-off and contributes to a meaningful review process. A single-aisle transport aircraft (A320 class) serves as a use case for the established methodology. It consists of the conceptual aircraft design, the environmental life cycle assessment, and the direct operating costs analysis for a conventional reference aircraft and a hybrid-electric aircraft with a discrete parallel powertrain architecture. It should be noticed that the focus of this study is the comparison of conceptual aircraft designs of the same fidelity on system level, in lieu of the detailed modeling of a hybrid-electric aircraft. Results show that for a degree of hybridization of 0.3, the environmental impact of the hybrid-electric configuration increased by 15.1%, while the operating costs increased by 41.0% compared to a conventional reference aircraft. For a future scenario, favourable for hybrid-electric aircraft with i.a. renewable electricity production, the environmental impact could be reduced by 7.0% compared to the reference aircraft. At the same time, the operating costs gap between both configurations decreases to + 26.8%. Hybrid-electric aircraft should therefore be investigated further as a potential solution to reduce the environmental impact of aviation, if simultaneously to developing them the expansion of renewable energies is fostered. Nevertheless, this reduction in environmental impact involves a high direct operating costs penalty.

Highlights

  • Growing air traffic passenger volumes [1], but at the same time increasing environmental awareness and targets for greenhouse gas emission and noise reductions set by several advisory bodies, highlight the need of the aviation industry to constantly improve and reduce its environmental impact

  • On the one hand this can be attributed to the increased energy required by the hybridelectric aircraft (HEA) for the same mission, and to the difference in costs per kWh for kerosene and electricity

  • As airport and navigation fees are proportional to the maximum take-off mass (MTOM), they increase for the HEA1000

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Growing air traffic passenger volumes [1], but at the same time increasing environmental awareness and targets for greenhouse gas emission and noise reductions set by several advisory bodies, highlight the need of the aviation industry to constantly improve and reduce its environmental impact. Previous studies have undertaken conceptual designs of possible future hybrid-electric transport aircraft, exploiting the different alternatives hybrid-electric configurations offer (e.g., serial hybrid, parallel hybrid, discrete parallel hybrid, etc.). In order to be able to truly assess the DOC, environmental airport charges (emissions and noise) should be included. They are likely to increase for conventional jet engine aircraft in the future, and might be decisive for airlines. The aim of this paper is to undertake an environmental LCA and a DOC analysis for a hybrid-electric, single-aisle aircraft including the aforementioned shortcomings of previous studies. The scope is the system level assessment of conceptual aircraft designs of the same fidelity level showcasing potential benefits/drawbacks of HEA, rather than the detailed modeling of an HEA

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call