Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper examines the environmental justice of the Canadian military proposal to expand low-level training flights over lands traditionally occupied by the Innu and other aboriginal peoples who practice the last semi-nomadic hunting existence in North America. It reviews the implementation of the EIS process and the environmental justice of the decision. The fairness of the decision depended on how the EIS review was implemented: whether the reviewers and the procedures they followed were fair to the Innu, and whether they acted ethically in deciding to expand low-level military flights. This paper examines the history of the proposal, its two EIS reviews, the actions of the implementing agency, and the justice of the review process.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
