Abstract

In this chapter we provide a broad overview of three dominant ways environmental justice is framed within the scholarship and consider how Indigenous peoples’ understanding and demands for environmental justice necessitate a decolonising approach. Despite critiques, many scholars and policymakers still conceive of environment justice through a singular approach (as distributive equity, procedural inclusion, or recognition of cultural difference). Such a narrow reading fails to appreciate the intersecting and interacting processes that underpin environmental (in)justices faced by Indigenous peoples. We argue that the theoretical discussions and empirical research into environmental (in)justice need to extend beyond Western liberal philosophies and instead consider pluralistic approach to Indigenous environment justice which is founded on Indigenous ontologies and epistemologies, which include intergenerational and more-human-human justice requirements.

Highlights

  • EJ research employed a distributive justice lens to examine the inequitable distribution of environmental risks and the physical proximity of specific communities to the environmental risk (Walker 2009)

  • We explore how Māori challenges to settler-colonial governance and management of the Waipā River, along with other river systems in Aotearoa, are examples of Māori iwi and hapū rangatiratanga and their cultural continuance, despite their ongoing experiences of settler colonialism

  • The existing scholarship on IEJ indicates that the sophisticated practices of historical colonialism and political economy are evidence of indigenous communities’ around the globe’s ongoing struggles to maintain and re-assert their rights of self-determination

Read more

Summary

Communitarian

● An individual’s value rests in the strength of the wider community (whanau, hapu, iwi). ● The protection, care, and wellbeing of the community as a whole supersedes those of the individual. The duties to the community are of paramount importance. ● The collective (the wider communnity) is resposible for supporting the individual. The strength of the community (the whole) depends on every member. Every within the group possesses intrinsic value

Ground worldview
Place-based
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call