Abstract

BackgroundTwin studies offer a ‘natural experiment’ that can estimate the magnitude of environmental and genetic effects on a target phenotype. We hypothesised that fidgetiness and enjoyment of activity would be heritable but that objectively-measured daily activity would show a strong shared environmental effect.Methodology/Principal FindingsIn a sample of 9–12 year-old same-sex twin pairs (234 individuals; 57 MZ, 60 DZ pairs) we assessed three dimensions of physical activity: i) objectively-measured physical activity using accelerometry, ii) ‘fidgetiness’ using a standard psychometric scale, and iii) enjoyment of physical activity from both parent ratings and children's self-reports. Shared environment effects explained the majority (73%) of the variance in objectively-measured total physical activity (95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.63–0.81) with a smaller unshared environmental effect (27%; CI: 0.19–0.37) and no significant genetic effect. In contrast, fidgetiness was primarily under genetic control, with additive genetic effects explaining 75% (CI: 62–84%) of the variance, as was parent's report of children's enjoyment of low 74% (CI: 61–82%), medium 80% (CI: 71–86%), and high impact activity (85%; CI: 78–90%), and children's expressed activity preferences (60%, CI: 42–72%).ConclusionsConsistent with our hypothesis, the shared environment was the dominant influence on children's day-to-day activity levels. This finding gives a strong impetus to research into the specific environmental characteristics influencing children's activity, and supports the value of interventions focused on home or school environments.

Highlights

  • Contemporary models identify biological factors [1], deliberate health-related choices [2], and features of the home and local environment [3] as important determinants of physical activity

  • Consistent with our hypothesis, the shared environment was the dominant influence on children’s day-to-day activity levels. This finding gives a strong impetus to research into the specific environmental characteristics influencing children’s activity, and supports the value of interventions focused on home or school environments

  • Insofar as monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs are more similar in activity levels than dizygotic (DZ) twins, this implicates genetic influence, while the remainder of the variability can be attributed to environmental influence [9;10]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Contemporary models identify biological (genetic) factors [1], deliberate health-related choices (behaviour) [2], and features of the home and local environment [3] as important determinants of physical activity. The gold standard design would modify the environment and examine effects on activity, but existing environmental intervention studies in children, most of which focus on the school context, have produced mixed results [5,6,7,8]; in part because of the difficulty of targeting the key environmental drivers. This has led to calls for novel research designs that can quantify contribution of environmental influences to physical activity [4]. We hypothesised that fidgetiness and enjoyment of activity would be heritable but that objectively-measured daily activity would show a strong shared environmental effect

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call