Abstract
Natural disasters and human demolition create vast amounts of construction and demolition waste (CDW), with a substantial portion being concrete waste. Managing this concrete waste is a daunting challenge for developing countries with limited resources, aiming to mitigate its harmful environmental effects. Therefore, the proposed approach involves using recycled fine aggregates (RFA) instead of fresh fine aggregates (FFA) in concrete, which aligns closely with achieving sustainable environmental objectives. Extensive laboratory tests were conducted to assess the effects of adding RFA to concrete. The influence of 0 to 100% RFA replacement and different curing times was investigated on compressive strength, tensile strength, resistance against chloride ion penetration and chemicals exposure, and quality of aggregates. So, around 30%, 35%, 20%, and 79% reductions in compression strength, tensile strength, modulus of elasticity, and workability were estimated when 100% RFA was used in recycled aggregate concrete (RAC). However, according to results analyses, the performance of RAC is reliable up to 50% of RFA in proposed conditions and mix design. In addition, major environmental impacts such as global warming potential, aquatic eutrophication, and aquatic acidification were reduced by 47%, 40%, and 18%, respectively, for concrete having 50% RFA than concrete having 100% FFA.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Environmental science and pollution research international
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.