Environmental impact of Holstein Friesian and 3-breed crossbred dairy cows using a life cycle assessment approach applied to individual animals

Abstract

This study aimed to set up a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach at level of individual animals to assess the effects of a 3-breed crossbreeding program on the environmental impact of cows. It involved 564 cows, 279 purebred Holstein (HO) and 285 crossbreds (CR), originated from a 3-breed crossbreeding program based on the rotational use of Viking Red, Montebèliarde and HO sires and kept in 2 dairy herds of northern Italy (224 and 340 cows/herd, respectively). The reference unit of the LCA model was the lifetime of cows, from the birth to culling or death. Data were collected at different levels: individual animal-based data referred to the whole life (birth, calving, dry, cull or death dates, and milk production); individual test-date collection of body measures and BCS, used to predict body weight and to estimate energy requirements; common farm-based data concerning herd management (diets composition, and materials used). Data were used to compute: dry matter intake, milk and milk components production, gross income (GI) and income over feed costs (IOFC) pertaining to the lifespan of cows. An individual LCA-derived approach was set up to compute global warming potential (GWP), acidification and eutrophication potential (AP and EP, respectively), and land occupation (LO), which have been associated with different functional units (cow in her whole life or per d of life; kg of milk fat plus protein, and € of GI and of IOFC produced in the herd life). Data were analyzed using a generalized linear model including the fixed effects of genetic group (CR vs HO), farm and their interaction (genetic group x farm). Compared with HO, CR cows completed more lactations (+12%), had earlier first calving (-2 weeks), yielded more fat plus protein in milk both in the lifespan (+8%) and per d of life (+4%). Concerning the environmental impact, when compared with HO herd mates, CR cows had nominal greater emissions per cow in the whole life, similar emissions per d of life and nearly 3% lower GWP, AP and EP per kg of fat plus protein yielded in lifespan. Income over feed costs per unit of emission tended to be nearly 4% greater in CR compared with HO cows. Also the use of land tended to be lower in CR compared with HO in most indicators considered. In conclusion, LCA could be adapted to represent individual animals. Moreover, managing dairy cows according to a 3-breed rotational crossbreeding scheme may be regarded as a strategy that can contribute to mitigate the emissions and to improve the environmental impact of dairy operations.