Abstract
AbstractThe environmental impacts of the manufacture of chitosan (CS) and polymeric poly(1‐trimethylsilyl‐1‐propyne) (PTMSP) mixed‐matrix membranes (MMMs) for CO2 separation by life cycle assessment (LCA) are compared. An ionic liquid of non‐reported toxicity is used in CS membranes to enhance the mechanical strength, and different fillers are used to increase mechanical and functional properties: ETS‐10, ZIF‐8, HKUST‐1, and Zeolite A. Results with the same CO2 permeation flux indicate that ETS‐10/IL‐CS is the membrane manufacture with highest impacts due to its lower permeability. When comparing impacts with same permeation areas, the polymeric one is the membrane with highest impacts. Biopolymer and polymer manufacture are the components with highest contribution to the total environmental impacts of each membrane. To decrease all their impacts below fossil polymer membrane for the same CO2 permeation flux, CS membranes permeabilities should be improved by a numerical factor of 1000, 100, and 2 for the ETS‐10, ZIF‐8, and HKUST‐1/IL‐CS MMMs, respectively.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
