Abstract

Meta‐communities of habitat islands may be essential to maintain biodiversity in anthropogenic landscapes allowing rescue effects in local habitat patches. To understand the species‐assembly mechanisms and dynamics of such ecosystems, it is important to test how local plant‐community diversity and composition is affected by spatial isolation and hence by dispersal limitation and local environmental conditions acting as filters for local species sorting.We used a system of 46 small wetlands (kettle holes)—natural small‐scale freshwater habitats rarely considered in nature conservation policies—embedded in an intensively managed agricultural matrix in northern Germany. We compared two types of kettle holes with distinct topographies (flat‐sloped, ephemeral, frequently plowed kettle holes vs. steep‐sloped, more permanent ones) and determined 254 vascular plant species within these ecosystems, as well as plant functional traits and nearest neighbor distances to other kettle holes.Differences in alpha and beta diversity between steep permanent compared with ephemeral flat kettle holes were mainly explained by species sorting and niche processes and mass effect processes in ephemeral flat kettle holes. The plant‐community composition as well as the community trait distribution in terms of life span, breeding system, dispersal ability, and longevity of seed banks significantly differed between the two habitat types. Flat ephemeral kettle holes held a higher percentage of non‐perennial plants with a more persistent seed bank, less obligate outbreeders and more species with seed dispersal abilities via animal vectors compared with steep‐sloped, more permanent kettle holes that had a higher percentage of wind‐dispersed species. In the flat kettle holes, plant‐species richness was negatively correlated with the degree of isolation, whereas no such pattern was found for the permanent kettle holes.Synthesis: Environment acts as filter shaping plant diversity (alpha and beta) and plant‐community trait distribution between steep permanent compared with ephemeral flat kettle holes supporting species sorting and niche mechanisms as expected, but we identified a mass effect in ephemeral kettle holes only. Flat ephemeral kettle holes can be regarded as meta‐ecosystems that strongly depend on seed dispersal and recruitment from a seed bank, whereas neighboring permanent kettle holes have a more stable local species diversity.

Highlights

  • A meta‐community has been defined as “set of local communities that are linked by dispersal of multiple potentially interacting spe‐ cies” (Leibold et al, 2004)

  • Environmental filtering is based on the idea that abiotic factors select species with particular traits and phenotypes to establish, per‐ sist, and reproduce, but estab‐ lishment and persistence of species depend on biotic interactions (Bartelt‐Ryser, Joshi, Schmid, Brandl, & Balser, 2005; Kraft et al, 2015)

  • Whereas flat ephemeral kettle holes can be regarded as meta‐communities that strongly depend on seed dispersal and recruitment from a seed bank, the plant‐species richness of neighboring permanent kettle holes was not influenced by degree of isolation and had a more stable local species diversity

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

A meta‐community has been defined as “set of local communities that are linked by dispersal of multiple potentially interacting spe‐ cies” (Leibold et al, 2004). Studies using genetic techniques to track both pollen and seed dispersal have success‐ fully assessed functional connectivity of plant populations (Aavik, Holderegger, Edwards, & Billeter, 2013) highlighting the importance of both dispersal processes Features such asexual re‐ production (clonality), extreme longevity (trees, clonal plants), or the ability to survive under unfavorable conditions (seed bank) play an important role in connecting communities (Lienert, 2004) allowing species to overcome disturbances and habitat degradation (Cain, Milligan, & Strand, 2000). A significant difference in trait distribution be‐ tween communities would be an indication of niche differentiation between the two types of kettle holes

| METHODS
| DISCUSSION
Findings
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.