Abstract

Community assembly theory states that species assemble non-randomly as a result of dispersal limitation, biotic interactions, and environmental filtering. Strong environmental filtering likely leads to local assemblages that are similar in their functional trait composition (high trait convergence) while functional trait composition will be less similar (high trait divergence) under weaker environmental filters. We used two Arctic shelves as case studies to examine the relationship between functional community assembly and environmental filtering using the geographically close but functionally and environmentally dissimilar epibenthic communities on the Chukchi and Beaufort Sea shelves. Environmental drivers were compared to functional trait composition and to trait convergence within each shelf. Functional composition in the Chukchi Sea was more strongly correlated with environmental gradients compared to the Beaufort Sea, as shown by a combination of RLQ and fourth corner analyses and community-weighted mean redundancy analyses. In the Chukchi Sea, epibenthic functional composition, particularly body size, reproductive strategy, and several behavioral traits (i.e., feeding habit, living habit, movement), was most strongly related to gradients in percent mud and temperature while body size and larval development were most strongly related to a depth gradient in the Beaufort Sea. The stronger environmental filter in the Chukchi Sea also supported the hypothesized relationship with higher trait convergence, although this relationship was only evident at one end of the observed environmental gradient. Strong environmental filtering generally provides a challenge for biota and can be a barrier for invading species, a growing concern for the Chukchi Sea shelf communities under warming conditions. Weaker environmental filtering, such as on the Beaufort Sea shelf, generally leads to communities that are more structured by biotic interactions, and possibly representing partitioning of resources among species from intermediate disturbance levels. We provide evidence that environmental filtering can structure functional community composition, providing a baseline of how community function could be affected by stressors such as changes in environmental conditions or increased anthropogenic disturbance.

Highlights

  • A central question of community ecology is why species from a regional pool form similar or distinct local species compositions (Weiher et al, 1998)

  • This study explored whether and how the concepts of environmental filtering in community assembly theory applied to the functional composition of epibenthic communities using the Arctic Chukchi and Beaufort Sea epibenthic shelf communities as case studies

  • If we postulate that multiple environmental variables can offset their effects on functional dispersion (FDis), why did we see high trait convergence at one end of the combined environmental gradient but not the other? We suggest that the specific environmental variables at play only caused a sufficient filter at one end of the realized gradient, i.e., the actual conditions experienced on the shelf

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A central question of community ecology is why species from a regional pool form similar or distinct local species compositions (Weiher et al, 1998). These include dispersal limitation, biotic interactions, and environmental filters (Keddy, 1992; Pearson et al, 2018) This idea of filtering based on functional traits was first tested with terrestrial vegetation (Weiher et al, 1998; Götzenberger et al, 2012), terrestrial invertebrates (de Bello et al, 2009), and freshwater invertebrates (Conti et al, 2014), but has been used throughout all ecological systems in the framework of community assembly theory (Keddy, 1992; Weiher et al, 2011). If the functional traits represented by a local community do not optimally fill ecological niches and ecosystem functions, missing traits could predict the success of new species invasions (Webb et al, 2010; Pearson et al, 2018)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call