Abstract

BackgroundEnvironmental contamination with Toxocara eggs is considered the main source of human toxocariasis. The contribution of different groups of hosts to this contamination is largely unknown. Current deworming advices focus mainly on dogs. However, controversy exists about blind deworming regimens for >6-month-old dogs, as most of them do not actually shed Toxocara eggs. We aim to estimate the contribution of different non-juvenile hosts to the environmental Toxocara egg contamination and to assess the effects of different Toxocara-reducing interventions for dogs.MethodsA stochastic model was developed to quantify the relative contribution to the environmental contamination with Toxocara eggs of household dogs, household cats, stray cats, and foxes, all older than 6 months in areas with varying urbanization degrees. The model was built upon an existing model developed by Morgan et al. (2013). We used both original and published data on host density, prevalence and intensity of infection, coprophagic behaviour, faeces disposal by owners, and cats’ outdoor access. Scenario analyses were performed to assess the expected reduction in dogs’ egg output according to different deworming regimens and faeces clean-up compliances. Estimates referred to the Netherlands, a country free of stray dogs.ResultsHousehold dogs accounted for 39 % of the overall egg output of >6-month-old hosts in the Netherlands, followed by stray cats (27 %), household cats (19 %), and foxes (15 %). In urban areas, egg output was dominated by stray cats (81 %). Intervention scenarios revealed that only with a high compliance (90 %) to the four times a year deworming advice, dogs’ contribution would drop from 39 to 28 %. Alternatively, when 50 % of owners would always remove their dogs’ faeces, dogs’ contribution would drop to 20 %.ConclusionAmong final hosts of Toxocara older than 6 months, dogs are the main contributors to the environmental egg contamination, though cats in total (i.e. both owned and stray) transcend this contribution. A higher than expected compliance to deworming advice is necessary to reduce dogs’ egg output meaningfully. Actions focusing solely on household dogs and cats are unlikely to sufficiently reduce environmental contamination with eggs, as stray cats and foxes are also important contributors.

Highlights

  • Environmental contamination with Toxocara eggs is considered the main source of human toxocariasis

  • Environmental contamination with Toxocara eggs is believed to be the main source of human infections, which are usually caused by accidental ingestion of infective eggs present in the environment

  • In order to reduce the environmental contamination with Toxocara eggs, one should focus on the main egg shedders of T. canis and T. cati, i.e. dogs, cats, or foxes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Environmental contamination with Toxocara eggs is considered the main source of human toxocariasis. Ocular and visceral larva migrans, as well as exacerbation of asthmatic allergies, are often associated with Toxocara spp. infection in humans [1,2,3]. This is supported by evidence from serological studies [2], conclusive diagnosis can be very difficult [4] and seroconversion occurs often in people without recognized clinical symptoms [5]. In order to reduce the environmental contamination with Toxocara eggs, one should focus on the main egg shedders of T. canis and T. cati, i.e. dogs, cats, or foxes. Dogs are probably the population of hosts in which Toxocara infections can be controlled the best by the owners, because, in contrast to cats, there is no notable population of stray dogs in the Netherlands

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call