Abstract

Seven scenarios were designed to study the national environmental benefits of ULE in coal-fired power plants (CPPs), ULE in industrial coal burning (ICB) and NH3 emission reduction by using the GEOS-Chem model. The results showed that although the CPPs have achieved the ULE transformation target, the PM2.5 concentration across the country has decreased by 4.8% (1.4 μg/m3). Due to the complex non-linear chemical competition mechanism among nitrate and sulfate, the average concentration of nitrate in the country has increased by 1.5% (0.1 μg/m3), which has reduced the environmental benefits of the power plant emission reduction. If the ULE technology is applied to the ICB to further reduce NOx and SO2, although the PM2.5 concentration can be reduced by 10.1% (2.9 μg/m3), the concentration of nitrate will increase by 2.7% (0.2 μg/m3). Based on the CPPs-ULE, NH3 emissions reduced by 30% and 50% can significantly reduce the concentration of ammonium and nitrate, so that the PM2.5 concentration is decreased by 11.5% (3.3 μg/m3) and 16.5% (4.7 μg/m3). Similarly, based on the CPPs-ICB-ULE, NH3 emissions can be reduced by 30% and 50% and the PM2.5 concentration reduced by 15.6% (4.4 μg/m3) and 20.3% (5.8 μg/m3). The CPPs and ICB use the ULE technology to reduce NOx and SO2, thereby reducing the concentration of ammonium and sulfate, causing the PM2.5 concentration to decline, and NH3 reduction is mainly achieved through reducing the concentration of ammonium and nitrate to reduce the concentration of PM2.5. In order to better reduce the concentration of PM2.5, NOx, SO2 and NH3 emission reduction control measures should be comprehensively considered in different regions of China. By comprehensively considering the economic cost and environmental benefits of ULE in ICB and NH3 emission reduction, an optimal haze control scheme can be determined.

Highlights

  • The coal-fired power plants (CPPs) have achieved the ULE transformation target, the PM2.5 concentration across the country has decreased by 4.8% (1.4 μg/m3 ) compared with January 2015, and haze pollution is still very serious

  • If the ULE technology is applied to the industrial coal burning (ICB) to further reduce NOx and SO2, the PM2.5 concentration can be reduced by 10.1% (2.9 μg/m3 ), the concentration of nitrate will increase by 2.7%

  • Due to the complex non-linear chemical competition mechanism among them, the average concentration of nitrate in the country increases by 1.5% (0.1 μg/m3 ) under the condition of a large reduction in NOx and SO2 emissions, which reduces the environmental benefits of ULE of CPPs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The most important efforts to reduce air pollution include the installation of (ULE) technology at all coal-fired power plants (CPPs) by 2020, and these efforts have already produced measurable reductions in primary NOx , SO2 and particulate matter (PM) emissions [6].

Data Source and Method
Emissions Calculation
Scenario Design
Model Description and Sensitivity Tests
Pollutant Reduction Potential
Regional Sector Emission Reduction
Regional Emission Reduction
Benefits of Primary Pollutant Emission Reduction
Benefits of Secondary Pollutant Emission Reduction
Environmental Benefits of NH3 Emission Reduction
On the with basisthe of STD
Findings
Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call