Abstract

Animals show a rich diversity of signals and displays. Among the many selective forces driving the evolution of communication signals, one widely recognized factor is the structure of the environment where animals communicate. In particular, animals communicating by sounds often emit acoustic signals from specific locations, such as high up in the air, from the ground or in the water. The properties of these different display sites may impose different constraints on sound production, and therefore drive signal evolution. Here, we used comparative phylogenetic analyses to assess the relationship between calling site (aquatic versus nonaquatic), body size and call dominant frequency of 160 frog species from the families Ranidae, Leptodactylidae and Hylidae. We found that the frequency of frogs calling from the water was lower than that of species calling outside of the water, a trend that was consistent across the three families studied. Furthermore, phylogenetic path analysis revealed that call site had both direct and indirect effects on call frequency. Indirect effects were mediated by call site influencing male body size, which in turn was negatively associated with call frequency. Our results suggest that properties of display sites can drive signal evolution, most likely not only through morphological constraints imposed on the sound production mechanism, but also through changes in body size, highlighting the relevance of the interplay between morphological adaptation and signal evolution. Changes in display site may therefore have important evolutionary consequences, as it may influence sexual selection processes and ultimately may even promote speciation.

Highlights

  • Animals communicate with an extraordinary variety of display behaviors that span most sensory modalities (Bradbury & Vehrencamp 2011; Stevens 2013)

  • Our results suggest that properties of display sites can drive signal evolution, most likely through morphological constraints, in particular the ones imposed on the sound production mechanism

  • For Ranidae, the null hypothesis where there is no effect of display site on dominant frequency or on body size was supported (Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Animals communicate with an extraordinary variety of display behaviors that span most sensory modalities (Bradbury & Vehrencamp 2011; Stevens 2013). These chemical, visual or acoustic signals are known to experience strong selection pressures imposed by intended and unintended receivers, in particular in the context of sexual communication. By displaying from sites with particular properties, such as locations with reduced exposure to predators, animals can alter the selection pressures operating on their signals, and their evolution. Efforts to link acoustic signal features to optimal transmission properties, have not yielded consistent results

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call