Abstract

Although previous studies have examined microbial loads on food contact surfaces in blueberry packing plants, there is currently no information regarding microbial risks associated with mechanical berry harvesters used in commercial blueberry production. In this study, we surveyed up to nine fruit contact surfaces on seven mechanical harvesters in each of 2015 and 2016 in the field. These surfaces included the shaking rods at the front of the harvester, the sidewalls of the harvesting tunnel behind the shaking mechanism, the catcher plates collecting the detached berries, horizontal and vertical fruit conveyor belts, and berry lugs collecting the fruit at the back of the harvester. Swab samples were collected from each surface three times a day (morning, noon, and evening) and assessed for environmental and fecal indicator organisms including total aerobes, total yeasts and molds, coliforms and fecal coliforms, and enterococci. At the same time points, fruit samples were assessed for microbial loads before the fruit entered each harvester and after they exited the harvester. Results showed statistically significant differences in microbial loads among harvester surfaces, whereas the effect of sampling time was generally not significant. High levels of total aerobes and total yeasts and molds were recorded, especially on horizontal surfaces and/or those located at the bottom of the harvester such as the lower sidewall, the catcher plates, and the horizontal conveyor belt. These surfaces therefore should be targeted by cleaning and sanitization practices. There was also statistical evidence that passage through the harvester may increase the levels of the environmental microorganisms on fruit in the field. In contrast, fecal indicator organisms such as fecal coliforms and enterococci were detected only sporadically and at very low densities on harvester surfaces and blueberry fruit, and there was no evidence that passage through the harvester increased their levels on the fruit. Berry lugs consistently harbored microbial loads, and given their movement back and forth between the field and the packing plant, deserve particular attention with regard to cleaning, sanitization, and storage protocols.

Highlights

  • Comprehensive, science-based standards have been legislatively mandated by theFood and Drug Administration in the United States for the safe growing, harvesting, packing, and holding of fruits and vegetables for human consumption as part of the Produce Safety Rule under the Food Safety Modernization Act [1]

  • Analysis of variance indicated that microbial loads were affected by harvester surface in most comparisons

  • In a recent microbial survey in blueberry packing plants in the same blueberry production region of southern Georgia [3], population densities of total aerobes, yeasts and molds, and coliforms were found to be at least two orders of magnitude lower on various packing line surfaces compared with the harvester surfaces reported here

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Food and Drug Administration in the United States for the safe growing, harvesting, packing, and holding of fruits and vegetables for human consumption as part of the Produce Safety Rule under the Food Safety Modernization Act [1]. This legislation intended to clarify that people and businesses that provide food to the public, whether they produce, process, transport, or sell food, are responsible for taking necessary steps to ensure hazards that make food unsafe have been identified and controlled [2]. Growers consider sanitization protocols time-consuming and labor-intensive; they need science-based information to help decide which harvester surfaces to prioritize for cleaning and sanitization to optimize the allocation of labor resources while minimizing microbial risks

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call