Abstract
Review: Environment and the Law: a dictionary. By V. R. Patton-Hulce Reviewed by Johanna Sutherland Department of International Relations, Research School Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University Patton-Hulce, V. R. Environment and the Law: a dictionary. Contemporary Legal Issues. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 1995. hardbound US $39.50 ISBN: 0-87436-749-2. Acid free paper. Mission brown in the 70s and 80s and heritage green in the 90s -- dominant epochs for both house paint and environmental issues? Not for Vicki Patton-Hulce. She's still focused on brown, brown, brown. ‘Pollution and Federal US law’ would have perhaps been a better title for this dictionary because 'green' biodiversity, sustainable natural and cultural resource management, trade, consumption, and international legal issues receive scant treatment. The entries in Environment and the Law: a dictionary predominantly address domestic regulatory issues concerning waste, emissions and pollution, and although each entry is quite long, this is not an extensive and broad dictionary. But if we can attribute the dictionary's over-extended current title to the publisher's marketing inclinations, how well does the book meet its aspirations on its primary waste and pollution concerns? This dictionary was purportedly written for students from high school level onwards, and for people interested in environmental studies. It is intended to give readers a commonsense explanation of the fundamental principles of environmental law. It opens with an overview chapter on 'environment and the law’ and follows with an alphabetical list of entries on legal, technical and policy matters. This dictionary however, is unlikely to satisfy the broad market it is intended to serve. Although it includes tables of cases, statutes and regulations, a bibliography, and a general subject index, the entries are not sufficiently numerous nor detailed to assist with sound legal analysis. Take its entry on asbestos, for example. This classifies the various types of asbestos fiber by color and not by technical name or characteristic, and does not disaggregate the risks of asbestos according to its type. The Oxford Concise Dictionary of Ecology does not deal with legal issues, but it is a more accurate and reliable guide on technical definitions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.