Abstract

Phylogenetic turnover quantifies the evolutionary distance among species assemblages and is central to understanding the main drivers shaping biodiversity. It is affected both by geographic and environmental distance between sites. Therefore, analyzing phylogenetic turnover in environmental space requires removing the effect of geographic distance. Here, we apply a novel approach by deciphering phylogenetic turnover of European tetrapods in environmental space after removing geographic land distance effects. We demonstrate that phylogenetic turnover is strongly structured in environmental space, particularly in ectothermic tetrapods, and is well explained by macroecological characteristics such as niche size, species richness and relative phylogenetic diversity. In ectotherms, rather recent evolutionary processes were important in structuring phylogenetic turnover along environmental gradients. In contrast, early evolutionary processes had already shaped the current structure of phylogenetic turnover in endotherms. Our approach enables the disentangling of the idiosyncrasies of evolutionary processes such as the degree of niche conservatism and diversification rates in structuring biodiversity.

Highlights

  • Phylogenetic turnover quantifies the evolutionary distance among species assemblages and is central to understanding the main drivers shaping biodiversity

  • Geographic land distance explained some of the variation in true phylogenetic turnover (Simpsons pairwise dissimilarity index) between pairs of sample sites (Supplementary Figure 1a; adjusted regression R2 for amphibians: 0.03, squamates: 0.04, mammals: 0.29 and birds: 0.46)

  • True phylogenetic turnover refers to the fraction that is independent of geographic land distance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Phylogenetic turnover quantifies the evolutionary distance among species assemblages and is central to understanding the main drivers shaping biodiversity It is affected both by geographic and environmental distance between sites. We demonstrate that phylogenetic turnover is strongly structured in environmental space, in ectothermic tetrapods, and is well explained by macroecological characteristics such as niche size, species richness and relative phylogenetic diversity. Phylo-ß is affected by geographic and environmental distance between sites and represents macroecological and evolutionary processes of niche adaptation and separation by geographic barriers. Multiple evolutionary and ecological processes have shaped patterns of phylo-ß These processes have driven the emergence of species richness and phylogenetic diversity and have affected the niche size of species. Trends in relative phylogenetic diversity along environmental gradients may strongly affect the emergence of phylo-ß patterns and point to the degree of niche conservatism. Phylo-ß is hypothesized to be explained jointly (and relation) or independently (or relation) by niche size (NS), species richness (SR), relative phylogenetic diversity (PDrel) these three macroecological characteristics (species richness, relative phylogenetic diversity, and niche size) can jointly or independently explain variation in phylo-ß (Fig. 1c)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call