Abstract

The Euclidean first-passage percolation (FPP) model of Howard and Newman is a rotationally invariant model of FPP which is built on a graph whose vertices are the points of homogeneous Poisson point process. It was shown that one has (stretched) exponential concentration of the passage time $T_n$ from $0$ to $n\mathbf{e}_1$ about its mean on scale $\sqrt{n}$, and this was used to show the bound $\mu n \leq \mathbb{E}T_n \leq \mu n + C\sqrt{n} (\log n)^a$ for $a,C>0$ on the discrepancy between the expected passage time and its deterministic approximation $\mu = \lim_n \frac{\mathbb{E}T_n}{n}$. In this paper, we introduce an inductive entropy reduction technique that gives the stronger upper bound $\mathbb{E}T_n \leq \mu n + C_k\psi(n) \log^{(k)}n$, where $\psi(n)$ is a general scale of concentration and $\log^{(k)}$ is the $k$-th iterate of $\log$. This gives evidence that the inequality $\mathbb{E}T_n - \mu n \leq C\sqrt{\mathrm{Var}~T_n}$ may hold.

Highlights

  • If the answer is yes, it means that the difference Tn − μn can be reasonably well approximated by Tn − ETn

  • Due to the general lower bounds on nonrandom fluctuations proved in [4], it would suggest that the nonrandom fluctuation term is of the same order as the random one

  • Our main goal is to improve the log n term in Theorem 1.2. This has been done recently in a lattice firstpassage percolation (FPP) model and a directed polymer model in [2, 3] by an entropy reduction technique, showing that one can replace the log n term by log log n. Their key idea is to exploit the dependence between passage times between nearby points to reduce the number of times a concentration result like Theorem 1.1 is applied

Read more

Summary

Introduction

If the answer is yes, it means that the difference Tn − μn (used to control geodesics, for instance) can be reasonably well approximated by Tn − ETn. due to the general lower bounds on nonrandom fluctuations proved in [4], it would suggest that the nonrandom fluctuation term is of the same order as the random one (as is the case in exactly solvable directed last-passage percolation [5, Corollary 1.3]). Due to the general lower bounds on nonrandom fluctuations proved in [4], it would suggest that the nonrandom fluctuation term is of the same order as the random one (as is the case in exactly solvable directed last-passage percolation [5, Corollary 1.3]) This question is the focus of our paper.

Background
Main results
Preliminary results
The initial step
The induction step

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.