Abstract

The Euclidean first-passage percolation (FPP) model of Howard and Newman is a rotationally invariant model of FPP which is built on a graph whose vertices are the points of homogeneous Poisson point process. It was shown that one has (stretched) exponential concentration of the passage time $T_n$ from $0$ to $n\mathbf{e}_1$ about its mean on scale $\sqrt{n}$, and this was used to show the bound $\mu n \leq \mathbb{E}T_n \leq \mu n + C\sqrt{n} (\log n)^a$ for $a,C>0$ on the discrepancy between the expected passage time and its deterministic approximation $\mu = \lim_n \frac{\mathbb{E}T_n}{n}$. In this paper, we introduce an inductive entropy reduction technique that gives the stronger upper bound $\mathbb{E}T_n \leq \mu n + C_k\psi(n) \log^{(k)}n$, where $\psi(n)$ is a general scale of concentration and $\log^{(k)}$ is the $k$-th iterate of $\log$. This gives evidence that the inequality $\mathbb{E}T_n - \mu n \leq C\sqrt{\mathrm{Var}~T_n}$ may hold.

Highlights

  • If the answer is yes, it means that the difference Tn − μn can be reasonably well approximated by Tn − ETn

  • Due to the general lower bounds on nonrandom fluctuations proved in [4], it would suggest that the nonrandom fluctuation term is of the same order as the random one

  • Our main goal is to improve the log n term in Theorem 1.2. This has been done recently in a lattice firstpassage percolation (FPP) model and a directed polymer model in [2, 3] by an entropy reduction technique, showing that one can replace the log n term by log log n. Their key idea is to exploit the dependence between passage times between nearby points to reduce the number of times a concentration result like Theorem 1.1 is applied

Read more

Summary

Introduction

If the answer is yes, it means that the difference Tn − μn (used to control geodesics, for instance) can be reasonably well approximated by Tn − ETn. due to the general lower bounds on nonrandom fluctuations proved in [4], it would suggest that the nonrandom fluctuation term is of the same order as the random one (as is the case in exactly solvable directed last-passage percolation [5, Corollary 1.3]). Due to the general lower bounds on nonrandom fluctuations proved in [4], it would suggest that the nonrandom fluctuation term is of the same order as the random one (as is the case in exactly solvable directed last-passage percolation [5, Corollary 1.3]) This question is the focus of our paper.

Background
Main results
Preliminary results
The initial step
The induction step
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.