Abstract

Maximum entropy states or statistical mechanical equilibrium solutions have played an important role in the development of a fundamental understanding of turbulence and its role in geophysical flows. In modern general circulation models of the earth’s atmosphere and oceans most parameterizations of the subgrid-scale energy and enstrophy transfers are based on ad hoc methods or ideas developed from equilibrium statistical mechanics or entropy production hypotheses. In this paper we review recent developments in nonequilibrium statistical dynamical closure theory, its application to subgrid-scale modeling of eddy-eddy, eddy-mean field and eddy-topographic interactions and the relationship to minimum enstrophy, maximum entropy and entropy production arguments.

Highlights

  • The complexity of geophysical flows has made the understanding of the dynamics of the oceans and the atmosphere difficult

  • We present a discussion of the equilibrium statistical mechanics of Rossby wave turbulence and general mean flows over topography on a generalized β-plane as developed by Frederiksen & O’Kane (2005) [99]

  • The nonequilibrium statistical dynamical QDIA closure theory (Frederiksen (1999) [98]) has been extensively tested and in regularized form is in excellent agreement with results of direct numerical simulations of general mean flows interacting with inhomogeneous turbulence, Rossby waves and topography (O’Kane & Frederiksen (2004) [88] and Frederiksen & O’Kane (2005) [99]) and in predictability studies (O’Kane & Frederiksen (2008a) [71])

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The complexity of geophysical flows has made the understanding of the dynamics of the oceans and the atmosphere difficult. Canonical equilibrium states are exact statistically steady states for the DIA and QDIA closures and there is a general increase of entropy in DNS toward equilibrium not always monotonically, as discussed by Frederiksen & Bell (1983) [105], (1984) [106] for the internal gravity wave-turbulence problem These authors and others (Kleeman (2002) [107] and references therein) have used entropy as a measure of dynamical development and predictability. Frederiksen & Davies (1997) [57] developed representations of eddy viscosity and stochastic backscatter based on EDQNM and DIA closure models for barotropic turbulent flows on the sphere They found that their parameterizations cured the typical resolution dependence of atmospheric energy spectra with LES incorporating the parameterizations being in close agreement with higher resolution barotropic DNS.

Barotropic vorticity equation
The interaction coefficients are defined by
We may now define the entropy as
Statistical closure equations for homogeneous turbulence
The homogeneous DIA closure equations
Homogeneous SCFT and LET closure theories
Vorticity equation and DIA closure on the sphere
Then the spectral equation for homogeneous turbulence is
EDQNM closure on the sphere
Here the summations over p and q are determined by
The EDQNM Closure
The DIA closure
QDIA closure equations
Generalized Langevin Equation
Subgrid terms
Then the subgrid tendencies take the forms h h
Nonequilibrium January
Nonequilibrium results
Comparison with subgrid terms obtained from entropy methods
Summary

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.