Abstract

To examine skipjack tuna’s habitat utilization in the western North Pacific (WNP) we used an ensemble modelling approach, which applied a fisher- derived presence-only dataset and three satellite remote-sensing predictor variables. The skipjack tuna data were compiled from daily point fishing data into monthly composites and re-gridded into a quarter degree resolution to match the environmental predictor variables, the sea surface temperature (SST), sea surface chlorophyll-a (SSC) and sea surface height anomalies (SSHA), which were also processed at quarter degree spatial resolution. Using the sdm package operated in RStudio software, we constructed habitat models over a 9-month period, from March to November 2004, using 17 algorithms, with a 70:30 split of training and test data, with bootstrapping and 10 runs as parameter settings for our models. Model performance evaluation was conducted using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), the point biserial correlation coefficient (COR), the true skill statistic (TSS) and Cohen’s kappa (k) metrics. We analyzed the response curves for each predictor variable per algorithm, the variable importance information and the ROC plots. Ensemble predictions of habitats were weighted with the TSS metric. Model performance varied across various algorithms, with the Support Vector Machines (SVM), Boosted Regression Trees (BRT), Random Forests (RF), Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS), Generalized Additive Models (GAM), Classification and Regression Trees (CART), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Recursive Partitioning and Regression Trees (RPART), and Maximum Entropy (MAXENT), showing consistently high performance than other algorithms, while the Flexible Discriminant Analysis (FDA), Mixture Discriminant Analysis (MDA), Bioclim (BIOC), Domain (DOM), Maxlike (MAXL), Mahalanobis Distance (MAHA) and Radial Basis Function (RBF) had lower performance. We found inter-algorithm variations in predictor variable responses. We conclude that the multi-algorithm modelling approach enabled us to assess the variability in algorithm performance, hence a data driven basis for building the ensemble model. Given the inter-algorithm variations observed, the ensemble prediction maps indicated a better habitat utilization map of skipjack tuna than would have been achieved by a single algorithm.

Highlights

  • Species distribution modelling is based on the ecological niche concept, which is considered as the volume in the environmental space that permits positive growth of a species [1,2]

  • We evaluated the performance of our models using a multi-metric approach consisting of the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), the point biserial correlation coefficient (COR), the true skill statistic (TSS) and Cohen’s kappa (k) metrics, which is an approach that has been applied in other studies [22,59]

  • This work is a first attempt at a multi-algorithm species distribution habitat modelling for skipjack tuna in the western North Pacific, using presence-only response data and satellite-derived predictor variables

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Species distribution modelling is based on the ecological niche concept, which is considered as the volume in the environmental space that permits positive growth of a species [1,2]. The ecological niche concept provides a theoretical basis upon which the fundamental relationships between a species distribution and habitat are established [3]. Habitat suitability modeling is widely applied to model and predict habitats of highly migratory pelagic species [4,5], fishery hotspots [6,7] as well as habitat overlaps [8]. In many of these studies, the relationship between the species presence (occurrence) and the environment is established using single habitat suitability modeling algorithms. The scientific knowledge made available from such work has broadened our understanding of the utilization of the marine environment by pelagic species, and contributes significantly to management decisions around resource harvesting, conservation, and the effects of climate change

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call