Abstract

Soil microorganisms are primary decomposers driving carbon and nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. One prevailing view is that fungi, rather than bacteria, play a predominant role in litter decomposition. However, the roles of bacteria and factors that restrict their activity during decomposition remain unclear. We hypothesized that the limiting activity of bacterial decomposers is associated with litter size beyond chemical quality. To address this gap, we conducted a 180-d decomposition microcosm experiment to investigate the effect of fragment size (large, 1–2 mm; middle, 0.18–0.28 mm; small, <0.07 mm) of oak and pine litters on bacterial or fungal decomposition. Bacterial and fungal decomposition were accelerated with fragment size decrease, suggesting that an interface effect existed between microbial decomposers and litter. Generally, the decomposition ability of bacteria was more sensitive to changes in fragment size compared to fungi. Fungi resulted in faster decomposition of large fragments than bacteria. For small oak litter fragments, bacteria showed faster decomposition than fungi, whereas the opposite was true for small pine litter. Therefore, the decomposition dominance of bacteria and fungi was regulated by fragment size and influenced by the chemical quality of litter, especially the lignin:N ratio. The contrasting decomposition dominances of bacteria versus fungi were likely attributed to filamentous fungi penetrating litter interiors and forming mycelial bridges between scattered litters. Bacteria resided on litter surfaces and even formed biofilms. Consistent with the findings of the microcosm experiment, the proportion of small fragments was greater in the fresh litter layer than in the decomposed layer in the field, and greater in the pine forest than in the oak forest, suggesting the fresh, large, and low-quality litter was preferentially fragmented by fungi. Consequently, the dominance of fungi and bacteria during litter decomposition in the conventional view should be revisited considering the litter size.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.