Abstract

BackgroundEmergency department overutilization is a known contributor to the high per-capita healthcare cost in the United States. There is a knowledge gap regarding the substitution effect of walk-in clinic availability in primary care provider (PCP) offices and emergency department utilization (EDU). This study evaluates associations between PCP availability and EDU and analyzes the potential cost savings for health systems.MethodsA retrospective cohort analysis compared low acuity EDU rates in established patients at a family medicine residency's PCP office before and after walk-in clinic implementation. The practice had 12 providers, 12 residents, and a patient panel of approximately 7,000-8,000. Inclusion criteria were met if patients were: (1) established with the PCP office, (2) had a low acuity emergency department (ED) visit (emergency index score level 4 or 5) OR had a walk-in clinic visit at the family practice. ED visits were tracked from January 2018 to January 2020 and encounters were compared numbers to pre and post-implementation of a walk-in clinic. Cost savings for comparable management was estimated with average price differences for low acuity encounters in the ED versus clinic.ResultsOver the two-year timeframe, there were 10,962 total visits to the ED by family practice patients, 4,250 of these visits were low acuity. Despite gross monthly increases of EDU from 2018-2020, after implementation of a walk-in clinic in 2019, rates of total EDU decreased by 1.5% and low acuity utilization rates also decreased. The average annual patient census nearly doubled from 5,763 to 8,042. T-tests confirmed statistical significance with p-values <0.05. Average low acuity ED visits ($437) cost 4.9 times more than comparable PCP office visits ($91). Managing 2,387 patients in the walk-in clinic resulted in an estimated annual cost savings of $825,902.ConclusionExtended walk-in availability in primary care offices provides non-ED capacity for low acuity management and might mitigate low acuity ED utilization while providing more cost-effective care. This study supports similarly described pre-hospital diversions in reducing ED over-utilization by increasing access to care. Higher levels of evidence are needed to establish causality.

Highlights

  • The prevalence of emergency department overutilization for non-urgent care is common and is known to contribute to the high cost of US healthcare

  • Despite gross monthly increases of emergency department utilization (EDU) from 2018-2020, after implementation of a walk-in clinic in 2019, rates of total EDU decreased by 1.5% and low acuity utilization rates decreased

  • “Established patient” was defined according to Medicare's definition - patients with a primary care provider (PCP) visit within a historical three-year window [29]. Both our emergency department (ED) and PCP offices use the same electronic medical record (EMR) (Epic; Verona, WI), which allowed for the convenient generation of workbench reports for emergency room visit data by patients established at our practice

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The prevalence of emergency department overutilization for non-urgent care is common and is known to contribute to the high cost of US healthcare. The prevalence of low acuity ED visits is disproportionally high in Medicaid populations that have an increased number of social determinants and/or health illiteracy [3,4]. Medicaid populations are more than twice as likely to have a higher number of low acuity ED visits if they have one or more barriers, notably, difficulties in acute primary care appointment scheduling, transportation, or availability of office hours) [5]. Emergency department overutilization is a known contributor to the high per-capita healthcare cost in the United States. There is a knowledge gap regarding the substitution effect of walk-in clinic availability in primary care provider (PCP) offices and emergency department utilization (EDU). This study evaluates associations between PCP availability and EDU and analyzes the potential cost savings for health systems

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call