Abstract

Automatic topic-to-essay generation is a challenging task since it requires generating novel, diverse, and topic-consistent paragraph-level text with a set of topics as input. Previous work tends to perform essay generation based solely on the given topics while ignoring massive commonsense knowledge. However, this commonsense knowledge provides additional background information, which can help to generate essays that are more novel and diverse. Towards filling this gap, we propose to integrate commonsense from the external knowledge base into the generator through dynamic memory mechanism. Besides, the adversarial training based on a multi-label discriminator is employed to further improve topic-consistency. We also develop a series of automatic evaluation metrics to comprehensively assess the quality of the generated essay. Experiments show that with external commonsense knowledge and adversarial training, the generated essays are more novel, diverse, and topic-consistent than existing methods in terms of both automatic and human evaluation.

Highlights

  • Automatic topic-to-essay generation (TEG) aims at generating novel, diverse, and topic-consistent paragraph-level text given a set of topics

  • We propose a memory-augmented neural model with adversarial training to integrate external commonsense knowledge into topicto-essay generation

  • We develop a series of automatic evaluation metrics to comprehensively assess the quality of the generated essay

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Automatic topic-to-essay generation (TEG) aims at generating novel, diverse, and topic-consistent paragraph-level text given a set of topics. It has plenty of practical applications, e.g., benefiting intelligent education or assisting in keyword-based news writing (Leppanen et al, 2017), and serves as an ideal testbed for controllable text generation (Wang and Wan, 2018). The TEG task aims to generate paragraph-level text based solely on several given topics. Insufficient source information is likely to make the generated essays of low quality, both in terms of novelty and topic-consistency

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.