Abstract

Preventing the medium voltage (MV) transformer fault by protecting transformers against indirect lightning strikes plays a crucial role in enhancing the continuous service to electricity consumers. Surge arresters, if selected properly, are efficient devices in providing adequate protection for MV transformers against transient overvoltage impulses while preventing unwanted service interruptions. However, compared to other protective devices such as the spark gap, their prices are relatively high. The higher the surge arrester rating and energy absorption capacity are, the higher the prices go. This paper proposes an inductor-based filter to limit the energy pushed into the surge arrester, and consequently to prevent any unwanted failure. An energy-controlled switch is proposed to simulate the fault of the surge arrester. Surge arresters with different ratings, e.g., 12 kV, 18 kV, 24 kV, 30 kV, 36 kV, and 42 kV with two different classes of energy, namely, type a and type b, are tested under different indirect lightning impulses such as 100 kV, 125 kV, 150 kV, 175 kV, 200 kV, 250 kV, 300 kV, and 500 kV. Furthermore, these surge arresters are equipped with different filter sizes of 100 μH, 250 μH, 500 μH, and 1 mH. Results prove that equipping a surge arrester with a proper filter size enhances the performance of the surge arrester significantly such that a high rating and somewhat expensive surge arrester can be replaced by a low rating and cheap surge arrester while providing similar or even better protective performance for MV transformers. Therefore, such configurations not only enhance the protective capability of surge arrester, but also reduce the planning and operating costs of MV networks.

Highlights

  • Indirect lightning phenomena are more common than direct lightning and are considered as one of the primary sources of failures and damages in the medium voltage (MV) equipment by causing stress on their insulation system [1,2]

  • To perform the simulation setup, the two oval points of wire (b) in Figure 7 are disconnected to keep the surge arrester in the circuit, while the two oval points of wire (c) are connected to eliminate the spark gap. As this case focuses on finding the proper functionality margin of the surge arresters, for the sake of unambiguity, only the performance of the surge arrester related to the lightning impulse with the lowest overvoltage amplitude against which a fault, i.e., short circuit, occurs is reported

  • An inductor has been used as a filtering device to limit the energy pushed into the surge arrester

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Indirect lightning phenomena are more common than direct lightning and are considered as one of the primary sources of failures and damages in the medium voltage (MV) equipment by causing stress on their insulation system [1,2]. The MV transformers, among all the equipment, are more expensive, and providing adequate protection for them is of high importance. Proper protection of transformers enhances the system reliability as well as social welfare, and, by controlling the transient overvoltage stress, prevents/defers extra expenses imposed by transformer failure or severe damages [3]. Typically spark gaps are used to protect the transformers in MV networks against lightning impulses [4]. Spark gaps are rather cheap protective devices, their operation yields a service interruption due to voltage chop and such voltage chopping imposes steep voltage stress across the transformer terminal [5,6]. Transients may occur due to the energization of Energies 2020, 13, 4754; doi:10.3390/en13184754 www.mdpi.com/journal/energies

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call