Abstract

Abstract. We explore the potential of spaceborne radar (SR) observations from the Ku-band precipitation radars onboard the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) and Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) satellites as a reference to quantify the ground radar (GR) reflectivity bias. To this end, the 3-D volume-matching algorithm proposed by Schwaller and Morris (2011) is implemented and applied to 5 years (2012–2016) of observations. We further extend the procedure by a framework to take into account the data quality of each ground radar bin. Through these methods, we are able to assign a quality index to each matching SR–GR volume, and thus compute the GR calibration bias as a quality-weighted average of reflectivity differences in any sample of matching GR–SR volumes. We exemplify the idea of quality-weighted averaging by using the beam blockage fraction as the basis of a quality index. As a result, we can increase the consistency of SR and GR observations, and thus the precision of calibration bias estimates. The remaining scatter between GR and SR reflectivity as well as the variability of bias estimates between overpass events indicate, however, that other error sources are not yet fully addressed. Still, our study provides a framework to introduce any other quality variables that are considered relevant in a specific context. The code that implements our analysis is based on the wradlib open-source software library, and is, together with the data, publicly available to monitor radar calibration or to scrutinize long series of archived radar data back to December 1997, when TRMM became operational.

Highlights

  • Weather radars are essential tools in providing high-quality information about precipitation with high spatial and temporal resolution in three dimensions

  • In order to get a better idea about the overall workflow, we first exemplify the results for two specific overpass events – one for Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM), and one for Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM)

  • Our study extends that technique by an approach that takes into account the quality of the ground radar observations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Weather radars are essential tools in providing high-quality information about precipitation with high spatial and temporal resolution in three dimensions. Gauge adjustment accumulates uncertainties along the entire rainfall estimation chain (e.g. including the uncertain transformation from reflectivity to rainfall rate), and does not provide a direct reference for the measurement of reflectivity. Relative calibration (defined as the assessment of bias between the reflectivity of two radars) has been steadily gaining popularity, in particular the comparison with spaceborne precipitation radars (SR) (such as the precipitation radar onboard the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM; 1997–2014; Kummerow et al, 1998) and the dualfrequency precipitation radar on the subsequent Global Precipitation Measurement mission (GPM; 2014–present; Hou et al, 2013)). A major advantage of relative calibration and gauge adjustment in contrast to the absolute calibration

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call