Abstract

To quantitatively evaluate the possible advantages of quantifying and differentiating various soft tissues using virtual monochromatic images (VMI) derived from different dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) technologies. This study involved four DECT scanners with different technologies. CIRS phantom images were acquired in single-energy (SECT) and DECT modes with each scanner. The analysis focused on five equivalent soft-tissue inserts: adipose, breast, liver, muscle, and bone (200 mg). The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated for each equivalent soft-tissue insert. Finally, the contrasts of tissue pairs between DECT and SECT images were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests adjusted for multiple comparisons. Average CT numbers and noise showed a significant difference pattern between DECT with respect to SECT for each CT scanner. Generally, energy levels of 70 keV or higher led to improved SNR in VMI for most of the equivalent soft-tissue inserts. However, energy levels of 40–50 keV showed significantly higher contrasts in most of the equivalent soft-tissue insert pairs. DECT images at low energies, especially at 40–50 keV, outperform SECT images in discriminating soft tissues across all four DECT technologies. The combined use of DECT images reconstructed at different energy levels provides a more comprehensive set of information for diagnostic and/or radiotherapy evaluation compared to SECT. Some differences between scanners are evident, depending on the DECT acquisition technique and reconstruction method.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.