Abstract

<p style="text-align:justify">We investigated the effects of just-in-time guidance at various stages of inquiry learning by novice learners. Thirteen participants, randomly assigned to an intervention (n = 8) or control (n = 5) group, were observed as they learned about DC electric circuits using a web-based simulation. Just-in-time instructional prompts to observe, predict, explain, systematically test, collect evidence, and generate rules were strongly associated with diagnosing and correcting misconceptions, and constructing correct scientific concepts. Students’ repeated use of predictions, systematic testing, and evidence-coordinated reasoning often led to formulating new principles, generalizing from observed patterns, verifying comprehension, and experiencing “Aha!” moments. Just-in-time prompts helped learners manage embedded cognitive challenges in inquiry tasks, achieve a comprehensive understanding of the model represented in the simulation, and show significantly higher knowledge gain. Just-in-time prompts also promoted rejection of incorrect models of inquiry and construction of robust scientific mental models. The results suggest ways of customizing guidance to promote scientific learning within simulation environments.</p>

Highlights

  • Scientists seek to understand our complex natural world through systematic inquiry

  • Pilot testing had indicated this same information likely would be needed during task-related investigations so we provided just-in-time enabling prompts to help participants carry out basic operation of the simulation

  • We provided just-in-time prompts for discovery strategies to a group of randomly assigned participants engaged in inquiry learning with a simulation of DC circuits

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Scientists seek to understand our complex natural world through systematic inquiry They identify a problem and search for solutions through methodical observation, informed prediction, and analysis of outcomes. The false idea of energy as a substance seems to arise from ideas about creating and destroying energy prompted by frequent exposure to common phrases referring to ‘filled up’ with energy, ‘used up’ energy, lost energy, or exhaustion of batteries (Zhang et al, 2019) Such misconceptions can challenge concepts of energy as a conserved quantity that can only change from one form to another (Chi, 2008; Tatar & Oktay, 2007)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call