Abstract

The advantages of mist-netting, the main technique used in Neotropical bat community studies to date, include logistical implementation, standardization and sampling representativeness. Nonetheless, study designs still have to deal with issues of detectability related to how different species behave and use the environment. Yet there is considerable sampling heterogeneity across available studies in the literature. Here, we approach the problem of sample size optimization. We evaluated the common sense hypothesis that the first six hours comprise the period of peak night activity for several species, thereby resulting in a representative sample for the whole night. To this end, we combined re-sampling techniques, species accumulation curves, threshold analysis, and community concordance of species compositional data, and applied them to datasets of three different Neotropical biomes (Amazonia, Atlantic Forest and Cerrado). We show that the strategy of restricting sampling to only six hours of the night frequently results in incomplete sampling representation of the entire bat community investigated. From a quantitative standpoint, results corroborated the existence of a major Sample Area effect in all datasets, although for the Amazonia dataset the six-hour strategy was significantly less species-rich after extrapolation, and for the Cerrado dataset it was more efficient. From the qualitative standpoint, however, results demonstrated that, for all three datasets, the identity of species that are effectively sampled will be inherently impacted by choices of sub-sampling schedule. We also propose an alternative six-hour sampling strategy (at the beginning and the end of a sample night) which performed better when resampling Amazonian and Atlantic Forest datasets on bat assemblages. Given the observed magnitude of our results, we propose that sample representativeness has to be carefully weighed against study objectives, and recommend that the trade-off between logistical constraints and additional sampling performance should be carefully evaluated.

Highlights

  • Mist-netting remains as one of the most effective methods of sampling flying vertebrates

  • Speciesrich Amazonian dataset presented notable exceptions, with activities of a common nectarivore and a group of uncommon omnivores associated with the beginning of the night, while several common and uncommon frugivores were positively associated with the end of the night (Fig 3D)

  • Regardless of the study region, the common strategy of restricting sampling of Neotropical bat assemblages to only the first six hours of the night can only provide an incomplete sample of the entire assemblage

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mist-netting remains as one of the most effective methods of sampling flying vertebrates. Since its introduction as a formal sampling protocol, nets revolutionized wildlife studies, and most notably bat research [1, 2]. Field studies of bat communities employ mist-nets as the main sampling technique, across the Neotropical realm [4] as bats are difficult to be visually detected due to often strictly nocturnal habits. Indirect sampling and monitoring based on acoustic techniques, such as ultrasonic digital recording, still depend on ongoing technological and empirical advances before they can become reliable and widespread [5]. Direct sampling of microchiropteran assemblages over long field periods pose intrinsic difficulties for even the most enthusiastic nocturnal investigators, not least because the evolutionary legacy of the human sensory apparatus harks back to the earliest diurnal primates. It is understandable that fieldworkers should attempt to minimize time invested in nocturnal surveys

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call