Abstract
Mitochondrial genomes provided the first widely used sequences that were sufficiently informative to resolve relationships among animals across a wide taxonomic domain, from within species to between phyla. However, mitogenome studies supported several anomalous relationships and fell partly out of favour as sequencing multiple, independent nuclear loci proved to be highly effective. A tendency to blame mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has overshadowed efforts to understand and ameliorate underlying model misspecification. Here we find that influential assessments of the infidelity of mitogenome phylogenies have often been overstated, but nevertheless, substitution saturation and compositional non-stationarity substantially mislead reconstruction. We show that RY coding the mtDNA, excluding protein-coding 3rd codon sites, partitioning models based on amino acid hydrophobicity and enhanced taxon sampling improve the accuracy of mitogenomic phylogeny reconstruction for placental mammals, almost to the level of multi-gene nuclear datasets. Indeed, combined analysis of mtDNA with 3-fold longer nuclear sequence data either maintained or improved upon the nuclear support for all generally accepted clades, even those that mtDNA alone did not favour, thus indicating "hidden support". Confident mtDNA phylogeny reconstruction is especially important for understanding the evolutionary dynamics of mitochondria themselves, and for merging extinct taxa into the tree of life, with ancient DNA often only accessible as mtDNA. Our ancient mtDNA analyses lend confidence to the relationships of three extinct megafaunal taxa: glyptodonts are nested within armadillos, the South American ungulate, Macrauchenia is sister to horses and rhinoceroses, and sabre-toothed and scimitar cats are the monophyletic sister-group of modern cats.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
South American Ungulate
Mitogenomic Phylogeny
Anomalous Relationships
Substitution Saturation
Hidden Support
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Aug 12, 2009
Nature
Mar 18, 2015
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Apr 15, 2020
Biology & Philosophy
May 27, 2010
Jul 20, 2005
Chinese Science Bulletin
Feb 22, 2016
Systematic Biology
Apr 10, 2021
Journal of Molecular Evolution
Oct 1, 2006
PLOS ONE
Nov 5, 2015
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
May 7, 2015
Frontiers in Genetics
Jun 8, 2015
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Nov 1, 2019
Systematic Biology
May 13, 2021
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Apr 1, 2019
Jan 28, 2014
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Nov 1, 2023
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Nov 1, 2023
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Nov 1, 2023
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Nov 1, 2023
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Nov 1, 2023
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Nov 1, 2023
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Sep 1, 2023
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Sep 1, 2023
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Sep 1, 2023
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Sep 1, 2023