Enhancing Lower Eyelid Suspension Outcomes Through Pre-surgical Facial Nerve Reanimation: A Comparative Study.

Abstract

Lower eyelid suspension, a common therapeutic procedure for facial paralysis-induced eyelid retraction, faces challenges due to high recurrence in patients lacking facial muscle function and impedes wider adoption. This research aims to explore the potential effects of restoring orbicularis oculi muscle tension through facial nerve reanimation prior to lower eyelid suspension and to define the indications for lower eyelid suspension. The study encompassed 32 individuals with complete facial paralysis, segmented into group A (reanimation group) and group B (non-reanimation group), based on whether the orbicularis oculi muscle's tension was restored through facial nerve reconstruction prior to lower eyelid suspension. Subjective assessments of eyelid closure (the inter-eyelid gap upon gentle closure) and objective methods measures of scleral show (the distance from the pupil's center to the lower eyelid margin, MRD2) were used to provide a comprehensive analysis of long-term effectiveness. The group A exhibited significantly greater long-term improvement in lagophthalmos and lower eyelid ectropion. The alterations in MRD2 measured 2.66 ± 0.27mm in the group A versus 2.08 ± 0.53 mm in the group B, denoting a statistically significant variance (p < 0.001). Moreover, while the ratio of MRD2 preoperative 6 months postoperative revealed no significant difference between groups, a significant difference emerged in 12 months postoperative (group A: 1.02 ± 0.21; group B: 1.18 ± 0.24; p < 0.05), with the values in group A closer to 1, indicative of enhanced symmetry. Restoring the tension in the orbicularis oculi muscle through facial nerve reconstruction prior to palmaris longus tendon sling could effectively sustain long-term outcomes of lower eyelid retraction correction and reduce the recurrence rate. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .