Abstract

Big impacts from pressure transients are known to be major contributors to pipeline failures, and even small impacts have the potential to result in pipeline deterioration. The effects of these impacts on a pipeline are not disclosed in detail and are hard to evaluate completely by theoretical modeling or numerical simulation. The impacts excite cylindrical structures containing liquid, which results in the development of wave propagation along pipelines. In particular, quasi-longitudinal waves are known to be developed by fluid-structure interaction during propagation. However, impact signal detection needs great care because extreme noise may corrupt the signal. An enhanced wavelet-based approach is proposed to detect and localize the impact source. The method makes use of continuous wavelet transform and band summation within a band of interest along scales to enhance time-difference detectability. In addition, a noise reduction algorithm intended to remove burst noises, in practice, frequently contaminates the impact signals of interest. Experimental results from a water supply network under operation demonstrate that the proposed approach is able to suppress noise and successfully reveal the impact location. The proposed approach provides a more precise and robust way to localize impacts missed by the conventional cross-correlation algorithm.

Highlights

  • Water transmission mains are crucial parts of water utilities and important assets in the infrastructure of a country

  • The modulus of the waveform in continuous wavelet transform (CWT) is sharply localized in the time domain, but the scale parameter value ranges from 300 to 1200, corresponding to about 60% of the signal energy

  • As we can see in this figure, the two frequency responses are different, even if they are in the same transmission main

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Water transmission mains are crucial parts of water utilities and important assets in the infrastructure of a country. Transmission mains are designed to move large quantities of water from the supply source and to provide water to the smaller distribution mains. The likelihood of a transmission main failure is lower than for other piping systems because they are typically more substantial in design. When they do occur, the consequences of failure for a transmission main are much greater than those for a smaller distribution main. There is a greater chance of flooding and infrastructure failure due to the larger volume of water that would be expected to escape from a leaking or ruptured main. Pipeline failure is typically attributed to aging infrastructure, severe environmental conditions, and third-party damage [1,2]. Pressure monitoring has served as one of the most popular management interventions [3], and recently, unsteady pressure patterns [4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call