Abstract

This study aims to numerically assess the impact of wettability and relative permeability hysteresis on hydrogen losses during underground hydrogen storage (UHS) and explore strategies to minimize them by using an appropriate cushion gas. The research utilizes the Carlson model to calculate the saturation of trapped gas and the Killough model to account for water hysteresis. By incorporating the Land coefficient based on laboratory-measured data for a hydrogen/brine system, our findings demonstrate a significant influence of gas hysteresis on the hydrogen recovery factor when H2 is used as a cushion gas. The base model, which neglects the hysteresis effect, indicates a recovery factor of 78% by the fourth cycle, which can be improved. In contrast, the modified model, which considers hysteresis and results in a trapped gas saturation of approximately 17%, shows a hydrogen recovery factor of 45% by the fourth cycle. Additionally, gas hysteresis has a notable impact on water production, with an observed 12.5% increase in volume in the model that incorporates gas hysteresis. Furthermore, optimization of the recovery process was conducted by evaluating different cushion gases such as CO2, N2, and CH4, with the latter proving to be the optimal choice. These findings enhance the accuracy of estimating the H2 recovery factor, which is crucial for assessing the feasibility of storage projects.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call