Abstract

Four on-road studies were conducted in the Clifton area of Nottingham, UK, aiming to explore the relationships between driver workload and environmental engagement associated with ‘active’ and ‘passive’ navigation systems. In a between-subjects design, a total of 61 experienced drivers completed two experimental drives comprising the same three routes (with overlapping sections), staged one week apart. Drivers were provided with the navigational support of a commercially-available navigation device (‘satnav’), an informed passenger (a stranger with expert route knowledge), a collaborative passenger (an individual with whom they had a close, personal relationship) or a novel interface employing a conversational natural language ‘NAV-NLI’ (Navigation Natural Language Interface). The NAV-NLI was created by curating linguistic intercourse extracted from the earlier conditions and delivering this using a ‘Wizard-of-Oz’ technique. This term describes a research experiment in which subjects interact with a computer system that they believe to be autonomous, but which is actually being operated or partially operated by an unseen human being. The different navigational methods were notable for their varying interactivity and the preponderance of environmental landmark information within route directions. Participants experienced the same guidance on each of the two drives to explore changes in reported and observed behaviour. Results show that participants who were more active in the navigation task (collaborative passenger or NAV-NLI) demonstrated enhanced environmental engagement (landmark recognition, route-learning and survey knowledge) allowing them to reconstruct the route more accurately post-drive, compared to drivers using more passive forms of navigational support (SatNav or informed passenger). Workload measures (the Tactile Detection Task (TDT) and the National Aeronautical and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX)) indicated no differences between conditions, although SatNav users and collaborative passenger drivers reported lower workload during their second drive. The research demonstrates clear benefits and potential for a navigation system employing two-way conversational language to deliver instructions. This could help support a long-term perspective in the development of spatial knowledge, enabling drivers to become less reliant on the technology and begin to re-establish associations between viewing an environmental feature and the related navigational manoeuvre.

Highlights

  • Drivers frequently employ electronic navigation systems to assist them in route-planning and route-following

  • In order to inform the development of such a system, we explored three existing, recognised navigational models – a satnav (‘passive’), an informed passenger and a collaborative passenger (‘active’) – and determined the associated workload and performance

  • Paired-samples T tests revealed a significant drop in the perceived workload from drive 1 to drive 2 for the Satnav (D1 Mean =56.93, SD = 18.95; D2 Mean = 46.80, SD = 16.47, t(14) = 3.22, p = 0.01) and Collaborative Passenger (D1 Mean = 51.87, SD = 19.42; D2 Mean = 39.87, SD= 17.60, t(14) = 4.19, p < 0.001)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Drivers frequently employ electronic navigation systems to assist them in route-planning and route-following. The use of in-vehicle navigational systems is not without concerns, with literature highlighting the potential for elevated workload and distraction (Bach, Jæger, Skov, & Thomasse, 2009) (Nwakacha, Crabtree, & Burnett, 2013). Relying on such systems can result in erratic behaviour, such as unexpected lane changes, sudden braking and the inappropriate use of indicators, especially where drivers are unsure of the correct route to follow and subsequently make last minute changes (Burnett, 2000). The literature recognises that issues with the navigational display and the phrasing of wayfinding prompts can hinder the correct interpretation of navigation information (Forlizzi, Barley, & Seder, 2010)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call