Abstract

Uncertainty calculus overcomes many of the drawbacks affecting other well-known approaches to uncertain reasoning. Nevertheless, it suffers from other severe limitations and gives rise to counter-intuitive results. We show that common sense inconsistencies of uncertainty calculus originate from a scarce cognitive plausibility in the definition of propagation and aggregation operators, and we propose an improved version of Driankov's uncertainty calculus (1986) where the definition of such operators is substantially revised according to common sense criteria. Revised uncertainty calculus allows overcoming in a general and uniform way all the problems identified in uncertainty calculus and provides a substantial enhancement of cognitive plausibility. It has been successfully tested in the design and development of a real application concerning preventive diagnosis of power transformers.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.