Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether students in collaborative (two students to one Clinical Instructor [2:1]) learning placements differed on measures of clinical competence as compared with their peers in traditional (1:1) clinical placements. The population examined consisted of intermediate-level students in the physical therapy program at the University of Toronto. The outcome measure of clinical competence in this study was a weighted score acquired from the university's Evaluation of Clinical Competence (ECC) form. Seven subgroup clinical competence scores as well as the total clinical competence score were analyzed. The collaborative learning group demonstrated significantly higher scores on all aspects of the ECC instrument. This result suggests that achievement of clinical competence in patient evaluation, program planning, implementation of treatment, communication, management skills, professional behavior, and documentation were enhanced through collaborative learning.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.