Abstract

Objective. The JFK coma recovery scale-revised (JFK CRS-R), a behavioral observation scale, is widely used in the clinical diagnosis/assessment of patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC). However, the JFK CRS-R is associated with a high rate of misdiagnosis (approximately 40%) because DOC patients cannot provide sufficient behavioral responses. A brain–computer interface (BCI) that detects command/intention-specific changes in electroencephalography (EEG) signals without the need for behavioral expression may provide an alternative method. Approach. In this paper, we proposed an audiovisual BCI communication system based on audiovisual ‘yes’ and ‘no’ stimuli to supplement the JFK CRS-R for assessing the communication ability of DOC patients. Specifically, patients were given situation-orientation questions as in the JFK CRS-R and instructed to select the answers using the BCI. Main results. Thirteen patients (eight vegetative state (VS) and five minimally conscious state (MCS)) participated in our experiments involving both the BCI- and JFK CRS-R-based assessments. One MCS patient who received a score of 1 in the JFK CRS-R achieved an accuracy of 86.5% in the BCI-based assessment. Seven patients (four VS and three MCS) obtained unresponsive results in the JFK CRS-R-based assessment but responsive results in the BCI-based assessment, and 4 of those later improved scores in the JFK CRS-R-based assessment. Five patients (four VS and one MCS) obtained usresponsive results in both assessments. Significance. The experimental results indicated that the audiovisual BCI could provide more sensitive results than the JFK CRS-R and therefore supplement the JFK CRS-R.

Highlights

  • One minimally conscious state (MCS) patient (P13) achieved a score of 1 on the JFK coma recovery scale-revised (CRS-R)-based communication assessment and an accuracy of 86.5% in the brain–computer interface (BCI)-based assessment

  • The other seven patients, who all had scores of 0 on the JFK CRS-R communication subscale before the experiment, achieved accuracies ranging from 65.5% to 86%, which were significantly higher than the chance level (p < 0 .05, the binomial test)

  • The results of the two JFK CRS-R-based communication assessments after the experiment showed that four patients (P8, P10, P11 and P12) who achieved responsive results in the BCI-based assessment improved on the scores they obtained in the JFK CRS-Rbased assessment before the experiment

Read more

Summary

Data acquisition

EEG data were amplified using a SynAmps device (Compumedics, Neuroscan, Inc., Australia) sampled at 250 Hz and filtered between 0.01 and 30 Hz. All electrode impedances were maintained below 5 kΩ during data collection

Experimental procedure
Data processing
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call