Abstract

Lithium–sulfur batteries are currently being explored as promising advanced energy storage systems due to the high theoretical specific capacity of sulfur. However, achieving a scalable synthesis for the sulfur electrode material whilst maintaining a high volumetric energy density remains a serious challenge. Here, a continuous ball‐milling route is devised for synthesizing multifunctional FeS2/FeS/S composites for use as high tap density electrodes. These composites demonstrate a maximum reversible capacity of 1044.7 mAh g−1 and a peak volumetric capacity of 2131.1 Ah L−1 after 30 cycles. The binding direction is also considered here for the first time between dissolved lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) and host materials (FeS2 and FeS in this work) as determined by density functional theory calculations. It is concluded that if only one lithium atom of the polysulfide bonds with the sulfur atoms of FeS2 or FeS, then any chemical interaction between these species is weak or negligible. In addition, FeS2 is shown to have a strong catalytic effect on the reduction reactions of LiPSs. This work demonstrates the limitations of a strategy based on chemical interactions to improve cycling stability and offers new insights into the development of high tap density and high‐performance sulfur‐based electrodes.

Highlights

  • The unfavorable electrochemical kinetics of sulfur are caused by a combination of factors, such as the insulating nature of element sulfur and its reducperformance sulfur-based electrodes

  • The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images shown in Figure 2 illustrate the structural and morphology of the composite samples

  • FeS2/FeS/S composites employed as cathodes in Li–S batteries have been successfully prepared via a facile, continuous, ball-milling route

Read more

Summary

Introduction

(up to 80%) upon discharge.[3,4,5,6,7] As such, two main strategies have been developed for constructing composite cathode mate-. Such a design has many merits, that of commercial LiCoO2 (2.0–2.4 g cm−3) in lithium ion batteries,[31,32] and is a significant drawback in its potential use as a cathode in practical energy storage applications. The detailed interfacial catalytic mechanism was systematically investigated by electrochemical analysis, spectroscopic, and calculations

Results and Discussion
Conclusion
Experimental Section
Conflict of Interest
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call