Abstract

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme has been described and practiced for twenty years in the perioperative management of colorectal patients. ERAS is a complex, evidence based strategy which proved to be extremely effective when linked to laparoscopy in reducing morbidity, length of hospital stay, as well as reducing cost of colorectal service. We gradually adapted elements of ERAS protocol along with laparoscopy in the colorectal surgical treatment at a county hospital from 2013. This study reports a retrospective clinical audit of ERAS programme of two years, between 2015-2016. In this timeframe we compared clinical results of traditional and ERAS perioperative colorectal management protocols. The two groups were assessed on the basis of demographic, cancer-related parameters and clinical outcomes. Over the two years of audit we treated 130 patients under "traditional" and 84 cases according to ERAS protocol. Mean length of hospital stay was 8 and 6 days median, respectively. Earlier discharge in the ERAS group did not cause any increase in the readmission rates. Morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or more) was found to be less in ERAS group: 8,3% vs. 27,4%. ERAS programme success rate, characterized by discharge by 7th postoperative day, was over 70%, keeping well with rates of the experienced centres of ERAS. Therefore we can report a successful introduction of ERAS programme for colorectal service in a Middle-Eastern European county hospital. Based on the favourable outcome results of the retrospective audit we have extended ERAS protocol as first choice perioperative scheme for each elective colorectal case from the beginning of 2017.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call