Abstract

PurposeERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) programs have proven to reduce morbidity and hospital stay in colorectal surgery. However, the feasibility of these programs in elderly patients has been questioned. The aim of this study is to assess the implementation and outcomes of an ERAS program for colorectal cancer in elderly patients.MethodsThis is a multicenter observational study of a cohort of elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery within an ERAS program. A total of 188 consecutive patients over 70 years who underwent elective colorectal surgery within an ERAS program at three institutions during a 2-year period were included. The compliance with the ERAS protocol interventions was measure. Complications were evaluated according to Clavien-Dindo classification. Data on length of stay and readmission rates were analyzed.ResultsEarly intake and early mobilization were the most successfully carried out interventions. There was a global compliance rate of 56 % of patients for whom compliance was achieved with all measured interventions. The median hospital length of stay was 6 days. Almost 60 % of patients had no complications, 24 % had minor complications while 13 % had major complications; of them, 8 % patients were reoperated. The readmission rate was 6.4 %.ConclusionsERAS after colorectal surgery in elderly patients presents as safe and feasible based on good reported outcomes of compliance rates, complications, readmissions, and needs for reoperation.

Highlights

  • Over the last decade, the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have generated a true revolution in colorectal surgery

  • There is a lack of information on the exact impact of ERAS interventions in elderly patients, the current evidenced-based data has been recently reviewed in a systematic review from the UK [13]

  • This review reported to date two clinical trials comparing ERAS with non-ERAS, focused on elderly patients showing in favor of ERAS, a shorter length of stay and a significant decrease in minor complications [19, 20]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have generated a true revolution in colorectal surgery. This revolution has been compared to the innovative concept of total mesorectal excision for rectal surgery [1] or to that of the adoption of laparoscopic surgery as the gold standard in colon surgery [2, 3]. Most studies have excluded by definition elderly patients from ERAS pathways. The reason for such exclusion was that adherence to protocols in elderly patients was assumed to be unfeasible due to

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call