Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol (ERAS) versus Standard Protocol for Undergoing Radical Cystectomy in an Egyptian Population

Abstract

Abstract Background bladder cancer has been one of the commonest cancer. The gold standard for treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer is radical cystectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy and associated with considerable morbidity and mortality and healthcare cost. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are multimodal perioperative care pathways designed to achieve early recovery after surgical procedures. Aim and Objectives The aim of this study was to compare between the standard preoperative bowel preparation (SP) and ERAS protocol in terms of postoperative length of stay (LOS) and postoperative morbidity. Subjects and Methods This was a prospective randomized study was conducted in Ain shams university hospital – Alexandria university hospital involving fifty (50) patients were randomly divided into two equal groups twenty-Five (25) patient in group A follow ERAS protocol and twenty-Five (25) patients in group B following standard protocol. The duration of the study ranged from 6-12 months. Results There was statistically significant difference found between group A and group B regarding the studied parameters ( Readmission in 30 days, Ileus, Vomiting, and UTI) while there was no statistically significant difference between them regarding (early mobilization, urine leakage, dehesince and DVT), there was no statistically significant difference found between group A and group B regarding (Length of stay). Conclusion In patients undergoing radical cystectomy, enhanced recovery protocol is considered as a safe procedure and not associated with any increase in intraoperative and postoperative complications compared to standard protocol. The length of hospital stay was shorter in ERAS group.