Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the necessity of thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) as enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LC). We retrospectively compared between perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent LC with TEA (n=31) and with multimodal analgesia (MMA) (n=31). Furthermore, we also evaluated the patients' satisfaction by a questionnaire survey to the nurses. The only numeric rating scale (NRS) score on post-operative day (POD) 1 of the MMA group was significantly higher than that in the TEA group (p=0.002). In multivariate analysis, the factors that demonstrated significant correlation with hospital stay did not include analgesia. The 74% of the nurses felt equal or higher analgesic effect in the MMA group and interestingly, 84% of them answered that they would choose MMA if they were to undergo LC. TEA may not be necessary for ERAS in LC.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
