Enhanced Performance Dual Stage Pressure Retarded Osmosis

A dual stage PRO process has been proposed for power generation from a salinity gradient across a semi-permeable membrane. Both closed-loop and open-loop dual stage PRO system were evaluated using 2 M NaCl and Dead Sea as draw solutions, whereas the feed solution was either fresh water or seawater. The impact of feed salinity gradient resource and feed pressure on the net power generation and water flux were evaluated. The results showed that power density in stage one reached a maximum amount at, but the maximum net power generation occurred at. This result was mainly attributed to the variation of net driving pressure in stage one and two of the PRO process. The dual stage PRO process was found to perform better at high osmotic pressure gradient across the PRO membrane, for example when Dead Sea brine or highly concentrated NaCl was the draw solution. Total power generation in the dual stage PRO process was up to 40% higher than that in the conventional PRO process. This outcome was achieved through harvesting the rest of the energy remaining in the diluted draw solution. Therefore, a dual stage PRO process has the potential of maximizing power generation from a salinity gradient resource by 20%. DSPRO can be combined with desalination plant using seawater brine as the draw solution either in closed-loop or open-loop. This hybridization has multiple applications such as reducing the impact of discharging concentrated brine to sea, energy storage, and increase the recovery rate of the desalination. Power generation by DSPRO will reduce the energy consumption by the desalination processes. Waste heat from power plants can be used for the regeneration of the draw solution in the closed-loop DSPRO. Process modelling has been performed and shown promising results for DSPRO application for power generation. The impact of module configuration, area and length, with relation to draw solution concentration have shown to have significant impact on osmotically driven processes and should be counted for.

RETRACTED: Limitations of osmotic gradient resource and hydraulic pressure on the efficiency of dual stage PRO process

Limitations of osmotic gradient resource and hydraulic pressure on the efficiency of dual stage PRO process

Closed circuit PRO series No 4: CC-PRO hydroelectric power generation prospects from the Red Sea brine and Dead Sea salinity gradient

Hybrid membrane system for desalination and wastewater treatment : Integrating forward osmosis and low pressure reverse osmosis

Evaluation of forward osmosis as a pretreatment process for multi stage flash seawater desalination

Potential of osmotic power generation by pressure retarded osmosis using seawater as feed solution: Analysis and experiments

In order to ensure long-term sustainability of the reservoir, the gas industry in Qatar is faced with the challenge of reducing the volume of produced and process water (PPW) sent to disposal wells by 50% [1-3]. Recently, Qatargas initiated a project to recycle process water and thus, reduce disposal volumes using commercial advanced water treatment technologies [4]. One emerging technology, “osmotic concentration” (OC) has been identified that offers a low-energy alternative to conventional thermal or membrane volume reduction methods. Osmotic concentration is a membrane filtration process that mimics first step in a forward osmosis (FO) system. It requires a high salinity draw solution (DS) which passes on one side of a semi-permeable FO membrane while the feed passes on the other side. Water from the feed is drawn through the membrane, via natural osmosis, reducing the feed volume and increasing the volume of the draw solution. This paper summarizes the results of bench-scale volume reduction tests wit...

Pressure retarded osmosis for power generation and seawater desalination: Performance analysis

Nowadays, inadequate access to clean water has become one of the most pervasive problems due to the rapidly expanding global population and thus the exponentially growing demand in water and food supply, industry and social life (Shannon et al. 2008). Problems with water have called out for a large number of researchers to pay more attention to water sustainability and put forth effort to explore more robust technologies for wastewater treatment and desalination in addition to improving the efficiency of the current water production and distribution systems (Sikdar 2011). Among many potential solutions, membrane processes such as reverse osmosis (RO), nanofiltration (NF), ultrafiltration (UF), and microfiltration (MF) have found their overwhelming applications in water industry. However, these technologies are either chemically or energetically intensive, thus are castigated for high cost due to substantial chemical and energy consumptions as well as high fouling propensity which requires frequent backwash or cleaning. Forward osmosis (FO), utilizing the natural phenomenon of osmosis, is an emerging membrane process driven by the osmotic pressure gradient created across a semipermeable membrane by two flowing streams of varying concentration (i.e., the draw solution and the feed). Hence, the energy required to transport water across the membrane is almost negligible. Far from being so, FO creates much less problem of fouling and cleaning (Mi and Elimelech 2010). By virtue of these unique features, FO distinguishes itself from other membrane processes for sustainable supply of clean water. An example of the FO unit for wastewater treatment is shown in Fig. 1. In the FO process as illustrated, the draw solution (an aqueous solution of magnetic nanoparticles covered with thermosensitive polymer) (Ling et al. 2011) and the feed (wastewater) partitioned by the membrane flow co-currently through corresponding channels. The draw solution, having a higher osmotic pressure than the feed, draws water from the feed and flows back to the reservoir. As it continuously takes clean water from the feed, the draw solution in the reservoir becomes diluted. A regeneration process is connected to the reservoir to re-concentrate the draw solution as well as to produce clean water. A portion of the diluted draw solution is pre-heated with the aid of solar panel or waste heat and traverses a magnetic field. Upon heating, the magnetic nanoparticles covered with thermosensitive polymers change their surface property from hydrophilic to hydrophobic and are easily seized by the magnetic field or other filtration processes. As a result, clean water freely passes through and is collected as the product. The trapped magnetic nanoparticles are then sent back to the reservoir to replenish the draw solution. The 1st key component of the FO unit is the membrane material which should be semipermeable, i.e., allowing water to permeate through while blocking all the solutes in the draw and feed solutions. A tremendous amount of research has been conducted on the molecular design of new membrane materials with superior FO performance and great progress has been achieved in the past 5 years. To date, several types of FO membranes have been reported such as (1) flat sheet membranes made of cellulose esters (Wang et al. 2010a; Zhang et al. 2010); (2) J. Su M. M. Ling T.-S. Chung (&) Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, 4 Engineering Drive 4, Singapore 117576, Singapore e-mail: chencts@nus.edu.sg

Osmotic power generation by pressure retarded osmosis using seawater brine as the draw solution and wastewater retentate as the feed

The research aims to use a new technology for industrial water concentrating that contains poisonous metals and recovery quantities from pure water. Therefore, the technology investigated is the forward osmosis process (FO). It is a new process that use membranes available commercial and this process distinguishes by its low cost compared to other process. Sodium chloride (NaCl) was used as draw solution to extract water from poisonous metals solution. The driving force in the FO process is provided by a different in osmotic pressure (concentration) across the membrane between the draw and poisonous metals solution sides. Experimental work was divided into three parts. The first part includes operating the forward osmosis process using TFC membrane as flat sheet for NaCl. The operating parameters studied were: draw solutions concentration (10 – 95 g/l), draw solution flow rate (12-36 I/h), temperature of draw solution (30 and 40°C), feed solution concentration (10 -210 mg/l), feed solution flow rate (10 -50 l/h), temperature of feed solution (30 and 40°C) and Pressure (0.4 bar). The second part includes operating the forward osmosis process using CTA membrane as flat sheet for NaCl. The operating parameters studied were: draw solution concentration (15 – 95 g/l), feed solution concentration (10-210 mg/l). Constant temperature was maintained at 30°C. The last part includes operating the reverse osmosis process using TFC membrane as spiral wound module in order to separate NaCl salt from draw solution and obtain on pure water so as to usefully in different uses and also obtain on solution of NaCl concentrate which was recirculated to forward osmosis process. It is then used as draw solution. The operating parameter studied was: feed solution flow rate (15-55 l/h). The experimental results show that the water flux increases with increasing draw solution concentration, feed solution flow rate, temperature of draw solution and decreases with increasing feed solution concentration, draw solution flow rate and temperature of feed solution. The experiments also show that CTA membrane gives higher water flux than TFC membrane for forward osmosis operation.

Lab scale assessment of power generation using pressure retarded osmosis from wastewater treatment plants in the state of Kuwait

Thermodynamic optimization of Multistage Pressure Retarded Osmosis (MPRO) with variable feed pressures for hypersaline solutions

Nowadays, more and more attention is being paid to the production of green energy. Recently, energy from salinity gradients has also attracted interest. One such process that can generate useful work is the pressure-retarded osmosis (PRO), which uses a semi-permeable membrane to separate the feed and pressurized draw solutions. The semi-permeable membrane allows the transport of solvent (water) from the feed solution (diluted low pressure) side to the draw solution (concentrated high pressure) side, and thus, the excess of pressurized water on the draw side can be used to generate power, i.e., by expansion in the turbine. This work presents a preliminary numerical model developed to study the water and NaCl salt transport through the semi-preamble membrane and in the PRO module designed to perform experimental studies. The model was first verified for simple 2D module geometry. It was then used to study the flow through a simplified 3D module, mimicking the real one used in laboratory-scale experiments. The influence of the hydrodynamic pressure and the NaCl draw solution’s mass flow rate in the module on the energy generation efficiency was examined. The maximum power density obtained for half the osmotic pressure of the NaCl draw solution (i.e., for 28 bar) was found to be equal to approximately 4 W/m2. An increase in the flow rate of the draw solution causes a decrease in the thickness of the boundary layer at the membrane, which reduces the effect of the external concentration polarization. This results in an increase in the concentration difference on either side of the membrane, contributing to a non-linear increase in power density depending on this mass flow rate. Increasing the average velocity from 0.02 m/s to 0.1 m/s increases the power density by up to 80%, from approximately 2.6 to 4.7 W/m2.